Re: [RFC PATCH 09/53] netfs: Implement unbuffered/DIO vs buffered I/O locking

From: David Howells
Date: Mon Oct 16 2023 - 12:10:34 EST

Next message: Andy Shevchenko: "[PATCH v1 4/6] leds: gpio: Move temporary variable for struct device to gpio_led_probe()"
Previous message: Andy Shevchenko: "[PATCH v1 3/6] leds: gpio: Refactor code to use devm_gpiod_get_index_optional()"
In reply to: Jeff Layton: "Re: [RFC PATCH 09/53] netfs: Implement unbuffered/DIO vs buffered I/O locking"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> It's nice to see this go into common code, but why not go ahead and
> convert ceph (and possibly NFS) to use this? Is there any reason not to?

I'm converting ceph on a follow-on branch and for ceph this will be dealt with
there.

I could do NFS round about here, I suppose.

David

Next message: Andy Shevchenko: "[PATCH v1 4/6] leds: gpio: Move temporary variable for struct device to gpio_led_probe()"
Previous message: Andy Shevchenko: "[PATCH v1 3/6] leds: gpio: Refactor code to use devm_gpiod_get_index_optional()"
In reply to: Jeff Layton: "Re: [RFC PATCH 09/53] netfs: Implement unbuffered/DIO vs buffered I/O locking"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]