Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] arm64/kvm: Fine grain _EL2 system registers list that affect nested virtualization

From: Marc Zyngier
Date: Mon Oct 16 2023 - 06:35:13 EST


On 2023-10-16 11:11, Miguel Luis wrote:
Hi Eric,

On 16 Oct 2023, at 09:54, Eric Auger <eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Miguel,

On 10/13/23 20:41, Miguel Luis wrote:
Hi Eric,

On 12 Oct 2023, at 15:22, Eric Auger <eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Miguel,

On 10/11/23 20:01, Miguel Luis wrote:
Implement a fine grained approach in the _EL2 sysreg ranges.

Fixes: d0fc0a2519a6 ("KVM: arm64: nv: Add trap forwarding for HCR_EL2")
Signed-off-by: Miguel Luis <miguel.luis@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/emulate-nested.c | 88 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 82 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/emulate-nested.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/emulate-nested.c
index 9ced1bf0c2b7..3af49e130ee6 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/emulate-nested.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/emulate-nested.c
@@ -648,15 +648,91 @@ static const struct encoding_to_trap_config encoding_to_cgt[] __initconst = {
SR_TRAP(SYS_APGAKEYLO_EL1, CGT_HCR_APK),
SR_TRAP(SYS_APGAKEYHI_EL1, CGT_HCR_APK),
/* All _EL2 registers */
- SR_RANGE_TRAP(sys_reg(3, 4, 0, 0, 0),
- sys_reg(3, 4, 3, 15, 7), CGT_HCR_NV),
+ SR_TRAP(SYS_VPIDR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
I think you miss DBGVCR32_EL2
That would be op0 == 10, which I indeed didn't considered given the ranges
previously defined. From its pseudocode I see it would make sense only if EL1
would support AArch32 but that seems not to be in the plans.

+ SR_TRAP(SYS_VMPIDR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
+ SR_TRAP(SYS_SCTLR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
+ SR_TRAP(SYS_ACTLR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
+ SR_TRAP(SYS_SCTLR2_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
+ SR_RANGE_TRAP(SYS_HCR_EL2,
+ SYS_HCRX_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
+ SR_TRAP(SYS_SMPRIMAP_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
+ SR_TRAP(SYS_SMCR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
+ SR_TRAP(SYS_SDER32_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
+ SR_RANGE_TRAP(SYS_TTBR0_EL2,
+ SYS_TCR2_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
+ SR_TRAP(SYS_VTTBR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
+ SR_TRAP(SYS_VTCR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
+ SR_TRAP(SYS_VNCR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
+ SR_TRAP(SYS_VSTTBR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
+ SR_TRAP(SYS_VSTCR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
+ SR_TRAP(SYS_DACR32_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
+ SR_RANGE_TRAP(SYS_HDFGRTR_EL2,
+ SYS_HAFGRTR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
/* Skip the SP_EL1 encoding... */
SR_TRAP(SYS_SPSR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
SR_TRAP(SYS_ELR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
- SR_RANGE_TRAP(sys_reg(3, 4, 4, 1, 1),
- sys_reg(3, 4, 10, 15, 7), CGT_HCR_NV),
- SR_RANGE_TRAP(sys_reg(3, 4, 12, 0, 0),
- sys_reg(3, 4, 14, 15, 7), CGT_HCR_NV),
+ /* SPSR_irq, SPSR_abt, SPSR_und, SPSR_fiq */
+ SR_RANGE_TRAP(sys_reg(3, 4, 4, 3, 0),
+ sys_reg(3, 4, 4, 3, 3), CGT_HCR_NV),
+ SR_TRAP(SYS_IFSR32_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
+ SR_TRAP(SYS_AFSR0_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
+ SR_TRAP(SYS_AFSR1_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
+ SR_TRAP(SYS_ESR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
+ SR_TRAP(SYS_VSESR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
+ SR_TRAP(SYS_FPEXC32_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
+ SR_TRAP(SYS_TFSR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
+ SR_TRAP(SYS_FAR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
+ SR_TRAP(SYS_HPFAR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
you miss BRBCR_EL2
Yes, definitely. Same as above, didn't considered op0 == 10, (Table D18-1).
This one seems to me the only one missing too.

yep

Thanks for confirming it!


+ SR_TRAP(SYS_PMSCR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
+ SR_TRAP(SYS_MAIR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
+ SR_TRAP(SYS_AMAIR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
+ SR_TRAP(SYS_MPAMHCR_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
+ SR_TRAP(SYS_MPAMVPMV_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
+ SR_TRAP(SYS_MPAM2_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
+ SR_RANGE_TRAP(SYS_MPAMVPM0_EL2,
+ SYS_MPAMVPM7_EL2, CGT_HCR_NV),
About the MPAM where did you find the pseudo code?
The pseucode isn't available on the document. I'm following the statement when
HCR_EL2.NV is 1, where:

"The System or Special-purpose registers for which accesses are trapped and
reported using EC syndrome value 0x18 are as follows:
— Registers accessed using MRS or MSR with a name ending in _EL2, except, [...]"

ok thank you for the clarification. With

BRBCR_EL2 handling, feel free to add my

Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx>


Thank you Eric!

(I guess you will handle
DBGVCR32_EL2 in a separate patch)


I think that Marc is addressing it here:
https://lore.kernel.org/kvmarm/20231013223311.3950585-1-maz@xxxxxxxxxx/
but I can be wrong.

Marc, could you please confirm ?

Indeed, that's the fix. If you respin this series *now*, I can take
this patch and your series as a set of fixes for 6.6.

Thanks,

M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...