Re: [PATCH v1] perf intel-pt: pkt-decoder: Fix alignment issues

From: Adrian Hunter
Date: Thu Oct 05 2023 - 15:06:33 EST


On 5/10/23 18:48, Ian Rogers wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 3:19 PM Ian Rogers <irogers@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> The byte aligned buffer is cast to large types and dereferenced
>> causing misaligned pointer warnings from undefined behavior sanitizer.
>> Fix the alignment issues with memcpy which may require the
>> introduction of temporaries.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>
> This is a relatively small change that fixes building with
> -fsanitize=alignment -fsanitize-undefined-trap-on-error. Adrian, as
> this is Intel-PT could you take a look?

Thanks! This has been down my list of things to do for ages,
but using get_unaligned_le16() etc seems nicer. I sent a patch
set for that.

>
> Thanks,
> Ian
>
>> .../intel-pt-decoder/intel-pt-pkt-decoder.c | 21 ++++++++++++-------
>> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/intel-pt-decoder/intel-pt-pkt-decoder.c b/tools/perf/util/intel-pt-decoder/intel-pt-pkt-decoder.c
>> index af9710622a1f..28659874d84e 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/util/intel-pt-decoder/intel-pt-pkt-decoder.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/intel-pt-decoder/intel-pt-pkt-decoder.c
>> @@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ static int intel_pt_get_long_tnt(const unsigned char *buf, size_t len,
>> if (len < 8)
>> return INTEL_PT_NEED_MORE_BYTES;
>>
>> - payload = le64_to_cpu(*(uint64_t *)buf);
>> + memcpy_le64(&payload, buf, sizeof(payload));
>>
>> for (count = 47; count; count--) {
>> if (payload & BIT63)
>> @@ -220,6 +220,8 @@ static int intel_pt_get_3byte(const unsigned char *buf, size_t len,
>> static int intel_pt_get_ptwrite(const unsigned char *buf, size_t len,
>> struct intel_pt_pkt *packet)
>> {
>> + uint32_t tmp;
>> +
>> packet->count = (buf[1] >> 5) & 0x3;
>> packet->type = buf[1] & BIT(7) ? INTEL_PT_PTWRITE_IP :
>> INTEL_PT_PTWRITE;
>> @@ -228,12 +230,13 @@ static int intel_pt_get_ptwrite(const unsigned char *buf, size_t len,
>> case 0:
>> if (len < 6)
>> return INTEL_PT_NEED_MORE_BYTES;
>> - packet->payload = le32_to_cpu(*(uint32_t *)(buf + 2));
>> + memcpy(&tmp, buf + 2, sizeof(tmp));
>> + packet->payload = le32_to_cpu(tmp);
>> return 6;
>> case 1:
>> if (len < 10)
>> return INTEL_PT_NEED_MORE_BYTES;
>> - packet->payload = le64_to_cpu(*(uint64_t *)(buf + 2));
>> + memcpy_le64(&packet->payload, buf + 2, sizeof(packet->payload));
>> return 10;
>> default:
>> return INTEL_PT_BAD_PACKET;
>> @@ -258,7 +261,7 @@ static int intel_pt_get_mwait(const unsigned char *buf, size_t len,
>> if (len < 10)
>> return INTEL_PT_NEED_MORE_BYTES;
>> packet->type = INTEL_PT_MWAIT;
>> - packet->payload = le64_to_cpu(*(uint64_t *)(buf + 2));
>> + memcpy_le64(&packet->payload, buf + 2, sizeof(packet->payload));
>> return 10;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -454,6 +457,8 @@ static int intel_pt_get_ip(enum intel_pt_pkt_type type, unsigned int byte,
>> struct intel_pt_pkt *packet)
>> {
>> int ip_len;
>> + uint16_t tmp16;
>> + uint32_t tmp32;
>>
>> packet->count = byte >> 5;
>>
>> @@ -465,13 +470,15 @@ static int intel_pt_get_ip(enum intel_pt_pkt_type type, unsigned int byte,
>> if (len < 3)
>> return INTEL_PT_NEED_MORE_BYTES;
>> ip_len = 2;
>> - packet->payload = le16_to_cpu(*(uint16_t *)(buf + 1));
>> + memcpy(&tmp16, buf + 1, sizeof(tmp16));
>> + packet->payload = le16_to_cpu(tmp16);
>> break;
>> case 2:
>> if (len < 5)
>> return INTEL_PT_NEED_MORE_BYTES;
>> ip_len = 4;
>> - packet->payload = le32_to_cpu(*(uint32_t *)(buf + 1));
>> + memcpy(&tmp32, buf + 1, sizeof(tmp32));
>> + packet->payload = le32_to_cpu(tmp32);
>> break;
>> case 3:
>> case 4:
>> @@ -484,7 +491,7 @@ static int intel_pt_get_ip(enum intel_pt_pkt_type type, unsigned int byte,
>> if (len < 9)
>> return INTEL_PT_NEED_MORE_BYTES;
>> ip_len = 8;
>> - packet->payload = le64_to_cpu(*(uint64_t *)(buf + 1));
>> + memcpy_le64(&packet->payload, buf + 1, sizeof(packet->payload));
>> break;
>> default:
>> return INTEL_PT_BAD_PACKET;
>> --
>> 2.42.0.582.g8ccd20d70d-goog
>>