[PATCH][next] perf: fix spelling mistake "parametrized" -> "parameterized"

From: Colin Ian King
Date: Tue Oct 03 2023 - 03:49:19 EST


There are spelling mistakes in comments and a pr_debug message. Fix them.

Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@xxxxxxxxx>
---
tools/perf/tests/parse-events.c | 4 ++--
tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_all_pmu.sh | 2 +-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/parse-events.c b/tools/perf/tests/parse-events.c
index f78be21a5999..e52f45c7c3d1 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/parse-events.c
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/parse-events.c
@@ -2549,7 +2549,7 @@ static int test__pmu_events(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unused, int subtest
if (strchr(ent->d_name, '.'))
continue;

- /* exclude parametrized ones (name contains '?') */
+ /* exclude parameterized ones (name contains '?') */
n = snprintf(pmu_event, sizeof(pmu_event), "%s%s", path, ent->d_name);
if (n >= PATH_MAX) {
pr_err("pmu event name crossed PATH_MAX(%d) size\n", PATH_MAX);
@@ -2578,7 +2578,7 @@ static int test__pmu_events(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unused, int subtest
fclose(file);

if (is_event_parameterized == 1) {
- pr_debug("skipping parametrized PMU event: %s which contains ?\n", pmu_event);
+ pr_debug("skipping parameterized PMU event: %s which contains ?\n", pmu_event);
continue;
}

diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_all_pmu.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_all_pmu.sh
index c77955419173..d2a3506e0d19 100755
--- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_all_pmu.sh
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_all_pmu.sh
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@

set -e

-# Test all PMU events; however exclude parametrized ones (name contains '?')
+# Test all PMU events; however exclude parameterized ones (name contains '?')
for p in $(perf list --raw-dump pmu | sed 's/[[:graph:]]\+?[[:graph:]]\+[[:space:]]//g'); do
echo "Testing $p"
result=$(perf stat -e "$p" true 2>&1)
--
2.39.2