Re: [PATCH V12 2/3] dt-bindings: pwm: add IPQ6018 binding

From: Devi Priya
Date: Fri Sep 29 2023 - 04:57:41 EST




On 9/29/2023 1:25 PM, Devi Priya wrote:


On 9/25/2023 12:41 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 25/09/2023 08:59, Devi Priya wrote:
DT binding for the PWM block in Qualcomm IPQ6018 SoC.

Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Co-developed-by: Baruch Siach <baruch.siach@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach <baruch.siach@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Devi Priya <quic_devipriy@xxxxxxxxxxx>

...

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/ipq-pwm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/ipq-pwm.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..857086ad539e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/ipq-pwm.yaml

Filename matching compatible, so qcom,ipq6018-pwm.yaml
okay
We would have other ipq compatibles (ipq9574 & ipq5332) being added to
the binding in the upcoming series.
So, shall we rename the binding to qcom,ipq-pwm.yaml

Thanks,
Devi Priya

@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/ipq-pwm.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: Qualcomm IPQ6018 PWM controller
+
+maintainers:
+  - Baruch Siach <baruch@xxxxxxxxxx>
+
+properties:
+  "#pwm-cells":
+    const: 2
+
+  compatible:
+    const: qcom,ipq6018-pwm

compatible is always the first property.
okay

+
+  reg:
+    description: Offset of PWM register in the TCSR block.
+    maxItems: 1
+
+  clocks:
+    maxItems: 1
+
+required:
+  - compatible
+  - reg
+  - clocks
+  - "#pwm-cells"

And this order must be the same as in properties.
okay

+
+additionalProperties: false
+
+examples:
+  - |
+    #include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-ipq6018.h>
+
+    syscon@1937000 {
+        compatible = "qcom,tcsr-ipq6018", "syscon", "simple-mfd";
+        reg = <0x01937000 0x21000>;
+        #address-cells = <1>;
+        #size-cells = <1>;
+        ranges = <0 0x1937000 0x21000>;

Drop this node, not related. The parent binding could have full example,
on the other hand. Additionally, I have doubts that you really tested
the parent binding.
Sure, will drop the syscon node

Thanks,
Devi Priya

+
+        pwm: pwm@a010 {
+            compatible = "qcom,ipq6018-pwm";

Best regards,
Krzysztof