Re: [PATCH v7 01/14] dt-bindings: usb: tps6598x: Add tps25750

From: Abdel Alkuor
Date: Thu Sep 28 2023 - 04:07:10 EST


On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 07:37:24AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 27/09/2023 19:53, Abdel Alkuor wrote:
> > From: Abdel Alkuor <abdelalkuor@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > TPS25750 is USB TypeC PD controller which is a subset of TPS6598x.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Abdel Alkuor <abdelalkuor@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Changes in v7:
> > - Define reg at top-level
> > - Remove description from reg-names
> > Changes in v6:
> > - Use reg property for patch address
> > Changes in v5:
> > - Add tps25750 bindings
> >
> > .../devicetree/bindings/usb/ti,tps6598x.yaml | 81 ++++++++++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 80 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/ti,tps6598x.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/ti,tps6598x.yaml
> > index 5497a60cddbc..9303d00b89de 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/ti,tps6598x.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/ti,tps6598x.yaml
> > @@ -20,8 +20,18 @@ properties:
> > enum:
> > - ti,tps6598x
> > - apple,cd321x
> > + - ti,tps25750
> > +
> > reg:
> > - maxItems: 1
> > + minItems: 1
> > + items:
> > + - description: main PD controller address
> > + - description: |
> > + I2C slave address field in PBMs input data
> > + which is used as the device address when writing the
> > + patch for TPS25750.
> > + The patch address can be any value except 0x00, 0x20,
> > + 0x21, 0x22, and 0x23
> >
> > wakeup-source: true
> >
> > @@ -32,10 +42,47 @@ properties:
> > items:
> > - const: irq
> >
> > + firmware-name:
> > + description: |
> > + Should contain the name of the default patch binary
> > + file located on the firmware search path which is
> > + used to switch the controller into APP mode.
> > + This is used when tps25750 doesn't have an EEPROM
> > + connected to it.
> > + maxItems: 1
> > +
> > required:
> > - compatible
> > - reg
> >
> > +allOf:
> > + - if:
> > + properties:
> > + compatible:
> > + contains:
> > + const: ti,tps25750
> > + then:
> > + properties:
> > + reg:
> > + maxItems: 2
> > +
> > + reg-names:
> > + items:
> > + - const: main
> > + - const: patch-address
>
> This should be at top level. I wrote it last time - do not define
> properties in if:then:, but in top-level.
>
Sorry, I thought only reg that should be defined on the top level as
you mentioned in the previous review. I misread your intention that any
property should also be defined in top-level.

I will fix it in v8.

> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Thank you for your time and your patience.

Abdel