Re: [PATCH net-next v4 3/6] net: bridge: Track and limit dynamically learned FDB entries

From: Ido Schimmel
Date: Tue Sep 26 2023 - 07:22:56 EST


On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 10:12:50AM +0200, Johannes Nixdorf wrote:
> A malicious actor behind one bridge port may spam the kernel with packets
> with a random source MAC address, each of which will create an FDB entry,
> each of which is a dynamic allocation in the kernel.
>
> There are roughly 2^48 different MAC addresses, further limited by the
> rhashtable they are stored in to 2^31. Each entry is of the type struct
> net_bridge_fdb_entry, which is currently 128 bytes big. This means the
> maximum amount of memory allocated for FDB entries is 2^31 * 128B =
> 256GiB, which is too much for most computers.
>
> Mitigate this by maintaining a per bridge count of those automatically
> generated entries in fdb_n_learned, and a limit in fdb_max_learned. If
> the limit is hit new entries are not learned anymore.
>
> For backwards compatibility the default setting of 0 disables the limit.
>
> User-added entries by netlink or from bridge or bridge port addresses
> are never blocked and do not count towards that limit.
>
> Introduce a new fdb entry flag BR_FDB_DYNAMIC_LEARNED to keep track of
> whether an FDB entry is included in the count. The flag is enabled for
> dynamically learned entries, and disabled for all other entries. This
> should be equivalent to BR_FDB_ADDED_BY_USER and BR_FDB_LOCAL being unset,
> but contrary to the two flags it can be toggled atomically.
>
> Atomicity is required here, as there are multiple callers that modify the
> flags, but are not under a common lock (br_fdb_update is the exception
> for br->hash_lock, br_fdb_external_learn_add for RTNL).
>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Nixdorf <jnixdorf-oss@xxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@xxxxxxxxxx>