Re: [PATCH 02/15] dt-bindings: gce: mt8195: Add CMDQ_SYNC_TOKEN_SECURE_THR_EOF event id

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 25/09/2023 11:11, Jason-JH Lin (林睿祥) wrote:
> On Mon, 2023-09-25 at 08:42 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>  	 
>> External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until
>> you have verified the sender or the content.
>>  On 25/09/2023 07:05, Jason-JH Lin (林睿祥) wrote:
>>> Hi Krzysztof,
>>>
>>> Thanks for the reviews.
>>>
>>> On Sat, 2023-09-23 at 20:01 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>   
>>>> External email : Please do not click links or open attachments
>> until
>>>> you have verified the sender or the content.
>>>>  On 18/09/2023 21:21, Jason-JH.Lin wrote:
>>>>> CMDQ_SYNC_TOKEN_SECURE_THR_EOF is used as secure irq to notify
>> CMDQ
>>>>> driver in the normal world that GCE secure thread has completed a
>>>> task
>>>>> in thee secure world.
>>>>
>>>> How can #define be added after its usage? Does it even make any
>> sense
>>>> of
>>>> being separate patch?
>>>>
>>>
>>> This definition is used in the mt8195.dts at [PATCH 15/15] and the
>> CMDQ
>>
>> No, the define is used in previous patch, which means your patchset
>> is
>> not bisectable and not tested.
>>
> 
> Do you mean this patch should add before patch 1?
> 
> 
> The example of dts in patch 1 is used the definition of mt8188, so I
> think I can add this patch to define the gce event id for mt8195 after
> patch 1.
> 
> I will swap the patch 1 and the patch 2 in the next version, if that
> can make it more appropriate.

Really, test your patches. Each of them individually. Appropriateness is
one thing, but broken bisectability is an error.

Anyway, the patch is logically part of binding adding this, so it should
be squashed. Don't create some weird patch ordering where every define
or every function is in its own patch. I commented about it multiple
times in this patchset.

Best regards,
Krzysztof