Re: [PATCH net-next v2 00/10] define and enforce phylink bindings

[Arınç ÜNAL]

On 23.09.2023 01:44, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > However, to dress this up as "phylink requires xyz, so lets create
> > a phylink binding description" is just wrong.
>
> +1
>
> Also, phylink is a Linux implementation detail. Other OSes using the
> binding don't need to have phylink. Yet they can still use the DT
> blobs because they should describe the hardware, independent of how
> the OS drives that hardware.

I haven't stated it directly but I've been agreeing to this fact since the
start of the discussion on patch 7.

Arınç