Re: [patch V3 18/30] x86/microcode: Handle "nosmt" correctly

From: Borislav Petkov
Date: Fri Sep 22 2023 - 09:42:21 EST


Just textual nitpicks. Otherwise looks nice.

On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 09:58:12AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> On CPUs where microcode loading is not NMI safe the SMT sibling which is
> parked in one of the play_dead() variants, these parked CPUs still react
> on NMIs.

s/, these parked CPUs still react/still reacts/.

Simpler.

> So if a NMI hits while the primary thread updates the microcode
> the resulting behaviour is undefined. The default play_dead()
> implementation on modern CPUs is using MWAIT, which is not guaranteed to
> be safe against an microcode update which affects MWAIT.

s/an //

> +/*
> + * Ensure that all required CPUs which are present and have been booted
> + * once are online.
> + *
> + * To pass this check, all primary threads must be online.
> + *
> + * If the microcode load is not safe against NMI then all SMT threads
> + * must be online as well because they still react on NMI when they are

s/react on NMI/react to NMIs/

> + * soft-offlined and parked in one of the play_dead() variants. So if a
> + * NMI hits while the primary thread updates the microcode the resulting
> + * behaviour is undefined. The default play_dead() implementation on
> + * modern CPUs is using MWAIT, which is also not guaranteed to be safe

s/is using/uses/

> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/internal.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/internal.h
> @@ -20,18 +20,17 @@ enum ucode_state {
>
> struct microcode_ops {
> enum ucode_state (*request_microcode_fw)(int cpu, struct device *dev);
> -
> void (*microcode_fini_cpu)(int cpu);
>
> /*
> - * The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that
> - * the callbacks below run on a target cpu when they
> - * are being called.
> + * The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that the callbacks
> + * below run on a target cpu when they are being called.

s/cpu/CPU/

while at it.

> * See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c.
> */
> - enum ucode_state (*apply_microcode)(int cpu);
> - int (*collect_cpu_info)(int cpu, struct cpu_signature *csig);
> - void (*finalize_late_load)(int result);
> + enum ucode_state (*apply_microcode)(int cpu);
> + int (*collect_cpu_info)(int cpu, struct cpu_signature *csig);
> + void (*finalize_late_load)(int result);
> + unsigned int nmi_safe : 1;
> };

--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette