Re: [patch V3 12/30] x86/microcode/intel: Reuse intel_cpu_collect_info()

From: Borislav Petkov
Date: Thu Sep 21 2023 - 15:47:20 EST


On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 09:58:02AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> static int collect_cpu_info(int cpu_num, struct cpu_signature *csig)

You can get rid of that silly wrapper too and use
intel_collect_cpu_info() in the function pointer assignment directly.

Diff ontop:

---

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h
index 4066dd3734ba..581ecfbaf134 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ extern __noendbr void cet_disable(void);

struct cpu_signature;

-void intel_collect_cpu_info(struct cpu_signature *sig);
+void intel_collect_cpu_info(int unused, struct cpu_signature *sig);

static inline bool intel_cpu_signatures_match(unsigned int s1, unsigned int p1,
unsigned int s2, unsigned int p2)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c
index 6c3b10e6b214..ebf0908fd91a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c
@@ -652,7 +652,7 @@ void reload_ucode_amd(unsigned int cpu)
}
}

-static int collect_cpu_info_amd(int cpu, struct cpu_signature *csig)
+static void collect_cpu_info_amd(int cpu, struct cpu_signature *csig)
{
struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu);
struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu;
@@ -670,8 +670,6 @@ static int collect_cpu_info_amd(int cpu, struct cpu_signature *csig)
uci->mc = p->data;

pr_info("CPU%d: patch_level=0x%08x\n", cpu, csig->rev);
-
- return 0;
}

static enum ucode_state apply_microcode_amd(int cpu)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
index 6d67b92d7252..77e4120de641 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ static inline unsigned int exttable_size(struct extended_sigtable *et)
return et->count * EXT_SIGNATURE_SIZE + EXT_HEADER_SIZE;
}

-void intel_collect_cpu_info(struct cpu_signature *sig)
+void intel_collect_cpu_info(int unused, struct cpu_signature *sig)
{
sig->sig = cpuid_eax(1);
sig->pf = 0;
@@ -362,7 +362,7 @@ static __init struct microcode_intel *get_ucode_from_cpio(struct ucode_cpu_info
if (!(cp.data && cp.size))
return NULL;

- intel_collect_cpu_info(&uci->cpu_sig);
+ intel_collect_cpu_info(0, &uci->cpu_sig);

return scan_microcode(cp.data, cp.size, uci);
}
@@ -423,12 +423,6 @@ void reload_ucode_intel(void)
apply_microcode_early(&uci, false);
}

-static int collect_cpu_info(int cpu_num, struct cpu_signature *csig)
-{
- intel_collect_cpu_info(csig);
- return 0;
-}
-
static enum ucode_state apply_microcode_late(int cpu)
{
struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu;
@@ -591,7 +585,7 @@ static void finalize_late_load(int result)

static struct microcode_ops microcode_intel_ops = {
.request_microcode_fw = request_microcode_fw,
- .collect_cpu_info = collect_cpu_info,
+ .collect_cpu_info = intel_collect_cpu_info,
.apply_microcode = apply_microcode_late,
.finalize_late_load = finalize_late_load,
};
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/internal.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/internal.h
index 051b7956d4fd..b3753025cd4a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/internal.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/internal.h
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ struct microcode_ops {
* See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c.
*/
enum ucode_state (*apply_microcode)(int cpu);
- int (*collect_cpu_info)(int cpu, struct cpu_signature *csig);
+ void (*collect_cpu_info)(int cpu, struct cpu_signature *csig);
void (*finalize_late_load)(int result);
};


--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette