Re: [PATCH V2 0/6] mm: page_alloc: freelist migratetype hygiene

From: Johannes Weiner
Date: Wed Sep 20 2023 - 09:48:18 EST


On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 08:07:53AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 9/20/23 03:38, Zi Yan wrote:
> > On 19 Sep 2023, at 20:32, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> >
> >> On 09/19/23 16:57, Zi Yan wrote:
> >>> On 19 Sep 2023, at 14:47, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> >>>> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> >>>> @@ -1651,8 +1651,13 @@ static bool prep_move_freepages_block(struct zone *zone, struct page *page,
> >>>> end = pageblock_end_pfn(pfn) - 1;
> >>>>
> >>>> /* Do not cross zone boundaries */
> >>>> +#if 0
> >>>> if (!zone_spans_pfn(zone, start))
> >>>> start = zone->zone_start_pfn;
> >>>> +#else
> >>>> + if (!zone_spans_pfn(zone, start))
> >>>> + start = pfn;
> >>>> +#endif
> >>>> if (!zone_spans_pfn(zone, end))
> >>>> return false;
> >>>> I can still trigger warnings.
> >>>
> >>> OK. One thing to note is that the page type in the warning changed from
> >>> 5 (MIGRATE_ISOLATE) to 0 (MIGRATE_UNMOVABLE) with my suggested change.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Just to be really clear,
> >> - the 5 (MIGRATE_ISOLATE) warning was from the __alloc_pages call path.
> >> - the 0 (MIGRATE_UNMOVABLE) as above was from the alloc_contig_range call
> >> path WITHOUT your change.
> >>
> >> I am guessing the difference here has more to do with the allocation path?
> >>
> >> I went back and reran focusing on the specific migrate type.
> >> Without your patch, and coming from the alloc_contig_range call path,
> >> I got two warnings of 'page type is 0, passed migratetype is 1' as above.
> >> With your patch I got one 'page type is 0, passed migratetype is 1'
> >> warning and one 'page type is 1, passed migratetype is 0' warning.
> >>
> >> I could be wrong, but I do not think your patch changes things.
> >
> > Got it. Thanks for the clarification.
> >>
> >>>>
> >>>> One idea about recreating the issue is that it may have to do with size
> >>>> of my VM (16G) and the requested allocation sizes 4G. However, I tried
> >>>> to really stress the allocations by increasing the number of hugetlb
> >>>> pages requested and that did not help. I also noticed that I only seem
> >>>> to get two warnings and then they stop, even if I continue to run the
> >>>> script.
> >>>>
> >>>> Zi asked about my config, so it is attached.
> >>>
> >>> With your config, I still have no luck reproducing the issue. I will keep
> >>> trying. Thanks.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Perhaps try running both scripts in parallel?
> >
> > Yes. It seems to do the trick.
> >
> >> Adjust the number of hugetlb pages allocated to equal 25% of memory?
> >
> > I am able to reproduce it with the script below:
> >
> > while true; do
> > echo 4 > /sys/kernel/mm/hugepages/hugepages-1048576kB/nr_hugepages&
> > echo 2048 > /sys/kernel/mm/hugepages/hugepages-2048kB/nr_hugepages&
> > wait
> > echo 0 > /sys/kernel/mm/hugepages/hugepages-2048kB/nr_hugepages
> > echo 0 > /sys/kernel/mm/hugepages/hugepages-1048576kB/nr_hugepages
> > done
> >
> > I will look into the issue.

Nice!

I managed to reproduce it ONCE, triggering it not even a second after
starting the script. But I can't seem to do it twice, even after
several reboots and letting it run for minutes.

> With migratetypes 0 and 1 and somewhat harder to reproduce scenario (= less
> deterministic, more racy) it's possible we now see what I suspected can
> happen here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/37dbd4d0-c125-6694-dec4-6322ae5b6dee@xxxxxxx/
> In that there are places reading the migratetype outside of zone lock.

Good point!

I had already written up a fix for this issue. Still trying to get the
reproducer to work, but attaching the fix below in case somebody with
a working environment beats me to it.

---