Re: [PATCH 5/6] mm: memory: add vm_normal_pmd_folio()

[Kefeng Wang]

On 2023/9/20 11:12, Huang, Ying wrote:
> Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > The new vm_normal_pmd_folio() wrapper is similar to vm_normal_folio(),
> > which allow them to completely replace the struct page variables with
> > struct folio variables.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >   include/linux/mm.h |  2 ++
> >   mm/memory.c        | 10 ++++++++++
> >   2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> > index 12335de50140..7d05ec047186 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> > @@ -2327,6 +2327,8 @@ struct folio *vm_normal_folio(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
> >   			     pte_t pte);
> >   struct page *vm_normal_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
> >   			     pte_t pte);
> > +struct folio *vm_normal_pmd_folio(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
> > +				  pmd_t pmd);
> >   struct page *vm_normal_page_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
> >   				pmd_t pmd);
>
> Why do not follow the counterpart of page (vm_normal_page_pmd()) to be
> vm_normal_folio_pmd()?

Personally, X_pmd_folio seems to get folio from a pmd, but X_folio_pmd 
looks like "return the PMD of a folio", I could use 
vm_normal_folio_pmd() for consistency, thanks.