Re: [RFC PATCH V1 0/6] sched/numa: Enhance disjoint VMA scanning

[Raghavendra K T]

On 9/19/2023 12:45 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On 8/29/2023 11:36 AM, Raghavendra K T wrote:
[...]

> > > Peter Zijlstra (1):
> > >     sched/numa: Increase tasks' access history
> > >
> > > Raghavendra K T (5):
> > >     sched/numa: Move up the access pid reset logic
> > >     sched/numa: Add disjoint vma unconditional scan logic
> > >     sched/numa: Remove unconditional scan logic using mm numa_scan_seq
> > >     sched/numa: Allow recently accessed VMAs to be scanned
> > >     sched/numa: Allow scanning of shared VMAs
> > >
> > >    include/linux/mm.h       |  12 +++--
> > >    include/linux/mm_types.h |   5 +-
> > >    kernel/sched/fair.c      | 109 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> > >    3 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> >
> > Hello Andrew,
> >
> > I am Resending patch rebasing to mm-unstable, adding results from Oliver
> > and Swapnil.
>
> Just for the record, a final version of this series should be submitted via
> the scheduler tree, not -mm.

Thank you for the clarification Ingo.. May be Andrew also wanted me to 
rebase directly to
scheduler tree. Last time patch series (numa scan enhancements)  had
 changes in mm/, but this time it is mostly fair.c.

I hope I have not missed anybody who should have been in the list from
sched side.

-Raghu