Re: [PATCH v2] cpufreq: Fix the race condition while updating the transition_task of policy

From: Viresh Kumar
Date: Tue Aug 29 2023 - 03:21:25 EST


On 29-08-23, 07:03, Liao Chang wrote:
> The field 'transition_task' of policy structure is used to track the
> task which is performing the frequency transition. Using this field to
> print a warning once detect a case where the same task is calling
> _begin() again before completing the preivous frequency transition via
> the _end().
>
> However, there is a potential race condition in _end() and _begin() APIs
> while updating the field 'transition_task' of policy, the scenario is
> depicted below:
>
> Task A Task B
>
> /* 1st freq transition */
> Invoke _begin() {
> ...
> ...
> }
> /* 2nd freq transition */
> Invoke _begin() {
> ... //waiting for A to
> ... //clear
> ... //transition_ongoing
> ... //in _end() for
> ... //the 1st transition
> |
> Change the frequency |
> |
> Invoke _end() { |
> ... |
> ... |
> transition_ongoing = false; V
> transition_ongoing = true;
> transition_task = current;
> transition_task = NULL;
> ... //A overwrites the task
> ... //performing the transition
> ... //result in error warning.
> }
>
> To fix this race condition, the transition_lock of policy structure is
> now acquired before updating policy structure in _end() API. Which ensure
> that only one task can update the 'transition_task' field at a time.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/b3c61d8a-d52d-3136-fbf0-d1de9f1ba411@xxxxxxxxxx/
> Fixes: ca654dc3a93d ("cpufreq: Catch double invocations of cpufreq_freq_transition_begin/end")
> Signed-off-by: Liao Chang <liaochang1@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index 26fa99d46684..5c09a4936699 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -455,8 +455,10 @@ void cpufreq_freq_transition_end(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> policy->cur,
> policy->cpuinfo.max_freq);
>
> + spin_lock(&policy->transition_lock);
> policy->transition_ongoing = false;
> policy->transition_task = NULL;
> + spin_unlock(&policy->transition_lock);
>
> wake_up(&policy->transition_wait);
> }

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>

--
viresh