Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: power: Add regulator-pd yaml file

[Shenwei Wang]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, August 28, 2023 2:31 PM
> To: Shenwei Wang <shenwei.wang@xxxxxxx>; Ulf Hansson
> <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>; Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>; Conor Dooley <conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>;
> Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@xxxxxxxxx>; Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>;
> imx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@xxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: power: Add regulator-pd yaml
> > The fixed-regulator is a virtual regulator driver that uses the GPIO pin.
> 
> We do not talk about drivers but bindings and DTS. Why do you bring again
> drivers, all the time?
> 
> > You claimed this
> > as a hardware chip.
> 
> ??? Sorry, this is getting boring. The DTS-snippet is a hardware chip.
> If it is not, then drop it from your DTS. I insist. Srsly, third time I insist.
> 
> 
> >
> > The regulator-pd driver also uses the same GPIO pin.
> 
> Again, what is with the drivers? Can you stop bringing it to the discussion?
> 

I have to admit you have a real talent for debate.

Thanks,
Shenwei


> > You now claimed this as a software layer.
> 
> ???
> 
> >
> > What's your standard?
> 
> I don't think there is anything more to say. You clearly do not understand what is
> DTS, schematics and how the actual hardware looks like.
> 
> I am not going to respond more to this patchset (which is a clear NAK just in
> case).
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof