RE: [PATCH v3 3/5] cdx: add support for bus enable and disable

From: Gangurde, Abhijit
Date: Thu Aug 24 2023 - 08:12:10 EST


> On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 03:52:21PM +0530, Abhijit Gangurde wrote:
> > CDX bus needs to be disabled before updating/writing devices
> > in the FPGA. Once the devices are written, the bus shall be
> > rescanned. This change provides sysfs entry to enable/disable the
> > CDX bus.
> >
> > Co-developed-by: Nipun Gupta <nipun.gupta@xxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Nipun Gupta <nipun.gupta@xxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Abhijit Gangurde <abhijit.gangurde@xxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Pieter Jansen van Vuuren <pieter.jansen-van-
> vuuren@xxxxxxx>
> > Tested-by: Nikhil Agarwal <nikhil.agarwal@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-cdx | 27 +++++++
> > drivers/cdx/cdx.c | 94 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/cdx/controller/cdx_controller.c | 50 +++++++++++++
> > drivers/cdx/controller/mc_cdx_pcol.h | 54 ++++++++++++++
> > drivers/cdx/controller/mcdi_functions.c | 24 +++++++
> > drivers/cdx/controller/mcdi_functions.h | 18 +++++
> > include/linux/cdx/cdx_bus.h | 12 ++++
> > 7 files changed, 279 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-cdx
> b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-cdx
> > index 7af477f49998..04c8dfe7e201 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-cdx
> > +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-cdx
> > @@ -11,6 +11,33 @@ Description:
> >
> > # echo 1 > /sys/bus/cdx/rescan
> >
> > +What: /sys/bus/cdx/enable
> > +Date: July 2023
> > +Contact: nipun.gupta@xxxxxxx
> > +Description:
> > + Writing bus number in hex to this file will attempt to enable
> > + the CDX bus. The bus number for the cdx devices can be found
> > + at /sys/bus/cdx/devices/cdx-BB:DD, where BB denotes the
> bus
> > + number for the respective device.
> > +
> > + For example ::
> > +
> > + # echo 00 > /sys/bus/cdx/enable
> > +
> > +What: /sys/bus/cdx/disable
> > +Date: July 2023
> > +Contact: nipun.gupta@xxxxxxx
> > +Description:
> > + Writing bus number in hex to this file will attempt to disable
> > + the CDX bus. CDX bus should be disabled before updating the
> > + devices in FPGA. The bus number for the cdx devices can be
> > + found at /sys/bus/cdx/devices/cdx-BB:DD, where BB denotes
> the
> > + bus number for the respective device.
> > +
> > + For example ::
> > +
> > + # echo 00 > /sys/bus/cdx/disable
> > +
> > What: /sys/bus/cdx/devices/.../vendor
> > Date: March 2023
> > Contact: nipun.gupta@xxxxxxx
> > diff --git a/drivers/cdx/cdx.c b/drivers/cdx/cdx.c
> > index 50df061f4537..411beb035fdd 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cdx/cdx.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cdx/cdx.c
> > @@ -70,6 +70,10 @@
> > #define CDX_DEFAULT_DMA_MASK (~0ULL)
> > #define MAX_CDX_CONTROLLERS 16
> >
> > +#define CONTROLLER_ID(X) \
> > + (((X) & CDX_CONTROLLER_ID_MASK) >>
> CDX_CONTROLLER_ID_SHIFT)
> > +#define BUS_ID(X) ((X) & CDX_BUS_NUM_MASK)
> > +
> > /* IDA for CDX controllers registered with the CDX bus */
> > DEFINE_IDA(cdx_controller_ida);
> > /* Lock to protect controller ops */
> > @@ -384,6 +388,94 @@ static struct attribute *cdx_dev_attrs[] = {
> > };
> > ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS(cdx_dev);
> >
> > +static struct cdx_controller *cdx_find_controller(u8 controller_id)
> > +{
> > + struct cdx_controller *cdx = NULL;
> > + struct platform_device *pd;
> > + struct device_node *np;
> > +
> > + for_each_compatible_node(np, NULL, compat_node_name) {
> > + if (!np)
> > + return NULL;
> > +
> > + pd = of_find_device_by_node(np);
> > + if (!pd)
> > + return NULL;
> > +
> > + cdx = platform_get_drvdata(pd);
> > + if (cdx && cdx->controller_registered && cdx->id ==
> controller_id) {
> > + put_device(&pd->dev);
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +
> > + put_device(&pd->dev);
>
> Where is the locking if a platform device is removed?

If platform device is removed, it is expected that controller would be
unregistered in its exit process. And controller unregistering is already
under the lock.

>
> > + }
> > +
> > + return cdx;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static ssize_t enable_store(const struct bus_type *bus,
> > + const char *buf, size_t count)
> > +{
> > + unsigned long controller_id;
> > + struct cdx_controller *cdx;
> > + u8 bus_id;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + if (kstrtou8(buf, 16, &bus_id))
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + controller_id = CONTROLLER_ID(bus_id);
> > + bus_id = BUS_ID(bus_id);
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(&cdx_controller_lock);
> > +
> > + cdx = cdx_find_controller(controller_id);
>
> You lock before you call this function? Is the lock required before you
> call it? If so, please document that and enforce it with the proper
> sparse marking.

Yes. Lock would be requiring for cdx_find_controller() to keep it in sync with
register and unregister. Will document it and add the sparse marking in
next version.

Thanks,
Abhijit.