Re: [PATCH v2] partitions/ibm: refactor deprecated strncpy

From: Heiko Carstens
Date: Thu Aug 24 2023 - 05:10:30 EST


On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 09:24:22PM +0000, Justin Stitt wrote:
> `strncpy` is deprecated [1] and we should favor different interfaces.
>
> A suitable replacement is `strtomem_pad` as it is a more robust and less
> ambiguous interface. In this case, the destination buffer is not
> necessarily NUL-terminated as Heiko points out [2]. Using `strtomem_pad`
> over strncpy means it is now more obvious what is expected of the
> destination buffer: 1) Not necessarily NUL-terminated and 2) padded with
> NUL-bytes
>
> Link: www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#strncpy-on-nul-terminated-strings[1]
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230823134936.14378-E-hca@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/ [2]
> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/90
> Suggested-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-hardening@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - prefer `strtomem_pad` over `strscpy` (thanks Kees)
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230822-strncpy-block-partitions-cmdline-ibm-v1-1-154dea8f755c@xxxxxxxxxx
> ---
> block/partitions/ibm.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/partitions/ibm.c b/block/partitions/ibm.c
> index 403756dbd50d..56c076c5523d 100644
> --- a/block/partitions/ibm.c
> +++ b/block/partitions/ibm.c
> @@ -111,11 +111,11 @@ static int find_label(struct parsed_partitions *state,
> !strcmp(temp, "LNX1") ||
> !strcmp(temp, "CMS1")) {
> if (!strcmp(temp, "VOL1")) {
> - strncpy(type, label->vol.vollbl, 4);
> - strncpy(name, label->vol.volid, 6);
> + strtomem_pad(type, label->vol.vollbl, 4);
> + strtomem_pad(name, label->vol.volid, 6);
> } else {
> - strncpy(type, label->lnx.vollbl, 4);
> - strncpy(name, label->lnx.volid, 6);
> + strtomem_pad(type, label->lnx.vollbl, 4);
> + strtomem_pad(name, label->lnx.volid, 6);
> }
> EBCASC(type, 4);
> EBCASC(name, 6);

This won't compile if find_label() is not inlined due the BUILD_BUG_ON()
within strtomem_pad(). However instead of sending new versions, I think it
would be better to ask Stefan and Jan to have a look at this. I think there
is room for improvement with the string handling besides getting rid of
strncpy().

And they know best the semantics of the (non-)strings.