Re: [PATCH V10 1/4] dt-bindings: clock: document Amlogic S4 SoC PLL clock controller

From: Yu Tu
Date: Wed Aug 23 2023 - 02:36:12 EST




On 2023/8/23 14:27, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
[ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]

On 23/08/2023 08:20, Yu Tu wrote:


On 2023/8/23 13:43, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

[ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]

On 23/08/2023 04:24, Yu Tu wrote:


On 2023/8/23 0:32, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
[ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]
On 22/08/2023 10:27, Yu Tu wrote:
Add the S4 PLL clock controller dt-bindings in the S4 SoC family.

Signed-off-by: Yu Tu <yu.tu@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Lovely. I sent youa friendly reminder at v8 which turns our you
ignored. You keep ignoring, I will start ignoring as well from now on.

Hi Krzysztof,

Sorry. I did not forget the friendly reminder in v8, I consulted you for
this at the time, so I re-sent V9 after adding the tag. Because it was
just "meson" that was removed. But V10 is based on Neil's patch, which I
think is a bit of a change. So I didn't dare add it. Instead of
forgetting your reminder.

So what should I do, I'll follow your advice exactly.

I don't think there was much difference between the version, which
received the review, and the current patch. Otherwise your changelog
should say that you drop Rb tag. Rebasing of something somewhere is not
the reason, so please describe what are the differences in the patch?

The current patch and V9 patch difference is mainly based on Neil patch
I put "include/dt - bindings/clock/amlogic,s4-pll-clkc.h" this document
describes the clock index all exposed.

Adding one include is insignificant change, thus any Rb tags should stay.

I got it.


Next, I should add Rob's tag and resend it. If you have any other
suggestions, please tell me and I will strictly follow your suggestions.

I cannot add someone's tag, thus on your next version you must include
it. I told this last time.

Well. I remember your advice. Guaranteed no errors in the next version.


Best regards,
Krzysztof