Re: [PATCH v3 00/11] iommu: Prepare to deliver page faults to user space

[Baolu Lu]

On 2023/8/22 2:31, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 07:40:36AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> > When a user-managed page table is attached to an IOMMU, it is necessary
> > to deliver IO page faults to user space so that they can be handled
> > appropriately. One use case for this is nested translation, which is
> > currently being discussed in the mailing list.
> >
> > I have posted a RFC series [1] that describes the implementation of
> > delivering page faults to user space through IOMMUFD. This series has
> > received several comments on the IOMMU refactoring, which I am trying to
> > address in this series.
>
> Looking at this after all the patches are applied..

Thank you very much for reviewing my patches.

> iommu_report_device_fault() and iommu_queue_iopf() should be put in
> the same file.

Yes. I will move both into io-pgfault.c. After that, iommu_queue_iopf()
becomes static.

> iommu_queue_iopf() seems misnamed since it isn't queuing anything. It
> is delivering the fault to the domain.

Yeah, perhaps we can rename it to iommu_handle_iopf().

/**
 * iommu_handle_iopf - IO Page Fault handler
 * @fault: fault event
 * @dev: struct device.

> It is weird that iommu_sva_domain_alloc is not in the sva file

Agreed. I will move it to iommu-sva.c.

> iopf_queue_work() wrappers a work queue, but it should trampoline
> through another function before invoking the driver's callback and not
> invoke it with a weird work_struct - decode the group and get back the
> domain. Every single handler will require the group and domain.

The work queue wrapper is duplicate. I will remove it and let the driver
to call queue_work() directly.

> Same for domain->iopf_handler, the domain should be an argument if we
> are invoking the function on a domain.
>
> Perhaps group->domain is a simple answer.

Yes. I will add domain in fault group and make it part of the parameters
of the callback.

Best regards,
baolu