Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: stats: Improve the performance of cpufreq_stats_create_table()

[Dhruva Gole]

On Aug 18, 2023 at 09:50:00 +0000, Liao Chang wrote:
> In the worst case, the freq_table of policy data is not sorted and
> contains duplicate frequencies, this means that it needs to iterate
> through the entire freq_table of policy to ensure each frequency is
> unique in the freq_table of stats data, this has a time complexity of
> O(N^2), where N is the number of frequencies in the freq_table of
> policy.
> 
> However, if the policy.freq_table is already sorted and contains no
> duplicate frequencices, it can reduce the time complexity of creating

s/frequencices/frequencies?

> stats.freq_table to O(N), the 'freq_table_sorted' field of policy data
> can be used to indicate whether the policy.freq_table is sorted.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Liao Chang <liaochang1@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c
> index 55c7ffd37d1c..fcb74050711a 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c
> @@ -243,7 +243,8 @@ void cpufreq_stats_create_table(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>  
>  	/* Find valid-unique entries */
>  	cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry(pos, policy->freq_table)
> -		if (freq_table_get_index(stats, pos->frequency) == -1)
> +		if ((policy->freq_table_sorted != CPUFREQ_TABLE_UNSORTED) ||

[...]

Otherwise looks okay to me,

Reviewed-by: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@xxxxxx>

-- 
Best regards,
Dhruva Gole <d-gole@xxxxxx>