Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: touchscreen: convert neonode,zforce to json-schema

From: Conor Dooley
Date: Wed Aug 16 2023 - 13:56:11 EST


On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 07:20:49PM +0200, Andreas Kemnade wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 15:52:16 +0100
> Conor Dooley <conor@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 08:29:45PM +0200, Andreas Kemnade wrote:
> > > Convert Neonode infrared touchscreen controller binding to DT schema.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > .../input/touchscreen/neonode,zforce.yaml | 67 +++++++++++++++++++
> > > .../bindings/input/touchscreen/zforce_ts.txt | 34 ----------
> > > 2 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
> > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/neonode,zforce.yaml
> > > delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/zforce_ts.txt
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/neonode,zforce.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/neonode,zforce.yaml
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 000000000000..1c45adb2407a
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/neonode,zforce.yaml
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
> > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause
> > > +%YAML 1.2
> > > +---
> > > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/input/touchscreen/neonode,zforce.yaml#
> > > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > > +
> > > +title: Neonode infrared touchscreen controller
> > > +
> > > +maintainers:
> > > + - Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > It;d be good to CC the person you're volunteering! I've done so.
> >
> well, apparently my get_maintainer.pl | confirm_and_add_addresses | git send-email
> script did not run in the kernel checkout I applied the patch to, so it did
> not catch that address. Sorry.

> BTW: What is common practice for the maintainer address
> in the binding in conversions? Here I looked at the commits of the plaintext binding.

Yeah, that seems reasonable to me.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature