RE: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v2 net] octeontx2-pf: fix page_pool creation fail for rings > 32k

From: Ratheesh Kannoth
Date: Wed Aug 16 2023 - 09:47:30 EST

Next message: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior: "Re: [PATCH 0/6] locking/rtmutex: Avoid PI state recursion through sched_submit_work()"
Previous message: Sean Christopherson: "Re: [PATCH v3 09/15] KVM: nSVM: Use KVM-governed feature framework to track "TSC scaling enabled""
In reply to: Alexander Lobakin: "Re: [PATCH v2 net] octeontx2-pf: fix page_pool creation fail for rings > 32k"
Next in thread: Ratheesh Kannoth: "[PATCH v2 net] octeontx2-pf: fix page_pool creation fail for rings > 32k"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> From: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v2 net] octeontx2-pf: fix page_pool creation fail
> for rings > 32k

> You still didn't respond to my previous message or maybe I missed the reply
> somewhere: why not min(numptrs, OTX2_PAGE_POOL_SZ)? Why create
> page_pool with 2k elements for rings with 128 descriptors?
ACK. Sorry. I missed it.

Next message: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior: "Re: [PATCH 0/6] locking/rtmutex: Avoid PI state recursion through sched_submit_work()"
Previous message: Sean Christopherson: "Re: [PATCH v3 09/15] KVM: nSVM: Use KVM-governed feature framework to track "TSC scaling enabled""
In reply to: Alexander Lobakin: "Re: [PATCH v2 net] octeontx2-pf: fix page_pool creation fail for rings > 32k"
Next in thread: Ratheesh Kannoth: "[PATCH v2 net] octeontx2-pf: fix page_pool creation fail for rings > 32k"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]