Re: [PATCH v1] kernel: usb: Adds space, removes trailing whitespace and fixes pointer declaration.

From: Greg KH
Date: Tue Aug 15 2023 - 17:06:01 EST


On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 02:18:41AM +0530, Atul Kumar Pant wrote:
> This patch fixes following checkpatch.pl issue:
> ERROR: space required before the open parenthesis '('
> ERROR: trailing whitespace
> ERROR: space required after that ','
> ERROR: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
>
> Signed-off-by: Atul Kumar Pant <atulpant.linux@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/usb/class/cdc-acm.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/class/cdc-acm.c b/drivers/usb/class/cdc-acm.c
> index 11da5fb284d0..638c9cdaa041 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/class/cdc-acm.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/class/cdc-acm.c
> @@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ static int acm_wb_is_avail(struct acm *acm)
> n = ACM_NW;
> spin_lock_irqsave(&acm->write_lock, flags);
> for (i = 0; i < ACM_NW; i++)
> - if(acm->wb[i].use)
> + if (acm->wb[i].use)
> n--;
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&acm->write_lock, flags);
> return n;
> @@ -1006,7 +1006,7 @@ static int wait_serial_change(struct acm *acm, unsigned long arg)
> }
> } while (!rv);
>
> -
> +
>
> return rv;
> }
> @@ -1257,7 +1257,7 @@ static int acm_probe(struct usb_interface *intf,
>
> if (control_interface == data_interface) {
> /* some broken devices designed for windows work this way */
> - dev_warn(&intf->dev,"Control and data interfaces are not separated!\n");
> + dev_warn(&intf->dev, "Control and data interfaces are not separated!\n");
> combined_interfaces = 1;
> /* a popular other OS doesn't use it */
> quirks |= NO_CAP_LINE;
> @@ -1428,7 +1428,7 @@ static int acm_probe(struct usb_interface *intf,
> goto err_free_write_urbs;
>
> if (h.usb_cdc_country_functional_desc) { /* export the country data */
> - struct usb_cdc_country_functional_desc * cfd =
> + struct usb_cdc_country_functional_desc *cfd =
> h.usb_cdc_country_functional_desc;
>
> acm->country_codes = kmalloc(cfd->bLength - 4, GFP_KERNEL);
> --
> 2.25.1
>

Hi,

This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. You have sent him
a patch that has triggered this response. He used to manually respond
to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept
writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was
created. Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem
in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux
kernel tree.

You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s)
as indicated below:

- Your patch did many different things all at once, making it difficult
to review. All Linux kernel patches need to only do one thing at a
time. If you need to do multiple things (such as clean up all coding
style issues in a file/driver), do it in a sequence of patches, each
one doing only one thing. This will make it easier to review the
patches to ensure that they are correct, and to help alleviate any
merge issues that larger patches can cause.

If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about
how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and
Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received
from other developers.

thanks,

greg k-h's patch email bot