Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3] selftests/bpf: trace_helpers.c: optimize kallsyms cache

[Stanislav Fomichev]

On 08/12, Rong Tao wrote:
> From: Rong Tao <rongtao@xxxxxxxx>
> 
> Static ksyms often have problems because the number of symbols exceeds the
> MAX_SYMS limit. Like changing the MAX_SYMS from 300000 to 400000 in
> commit e76a014334a6("selftests/bpf: Bump and validate MAX_SYMS") solves
> the problem somewhat, but it's not the perfect way.
> 
> This commit uses dynamic memory allocation, which completely solves the
> problem caused by the limitation of the number of kallsyms.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rong Tao <rongtao@xxxxxxxx>

I believe this is the one that won the pw race:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/tencent_50B4B2622FE7546A5FF9464310650C008509@xxxxxx/

Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@xxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
> v3: Do not use structs and judge ksyms__add_symbol function return value.
> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/tencent_B655EE5E5D463110D70CD2846AB3262EED09@xxxxxx/
>     Do the usual len/capacity scheme here to amortize the cost of realloc, and
>     don't free symbols.
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/tencent_AB461510B10CD484E0B2F62E3754165F2909@xxxxxx/
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/trace_helpers.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/trace_helpers.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/trace_helpers.c
> index f83d9f65c65b..d8391a2122b4 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/trace_helpers.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/trace_helpers.c
> @@ -18,10 +18,32 @@
>  #define TRACEFS_PIPE	"/sys/kernel/tracing/trace_pipe"
>  #define DEBUGFS_PIPE	"/sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace_pipe"
>  
> -#define MAX_SYMS 400000
> -static struct ksym syms[MAX_SYMS];
> +static struct ksym *syms;
> +static int sym_cap;
>  static int sym_cnt;
>  
> +static int ksyms__add_symbol(const char *name, unsigned long addr)
> +{
> +	void *tmp;
> +	unsigned int new_cap;

Nit: reverse Christmas tree, not sure we care for the tests though..