Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 03/13] integrity/digest_cache: Add functions to populate and search

From: Jarkko Sakkinen
Date: Mon Aug 14 2023 - 13:14:25 EST


On Sat Aug 12, 2023 at 1:46 PM EEST, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Add digest_cache_init_htable(), to size a hash table depending on the
> number of digests to be added to the cache.
>
> Add digest_cache_add() and digest_cache_lookup() to respectively add and
> lookup a digest in the digest cache.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> security/integrity/digest_cache.c | 131 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> security/integrity/digest_cache.h | 24 ++++++
> 2 files changed, 155 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/security/integrity/digest_cache.c b/security/integrity/digest_cache.c
> index 4201c68171a..d14d84b804b 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/digest_cache.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/digest_cache.c
> @@ -315,3 +315,134 @@ struct digest_cache *digest_cache_get(struct dentry *dentry,
>
> return iint->dig_user;
> }
> +
> +/**
> + * digest_cache_init_htable - Allocate and initialize the hash table
> + * @digest_cache: Digest cache
> + * @num_digests: Number of digests to add to the digest cache
> + *
> + * This function allocates and initializes the hash table. Its size is
> + * determined by the number of digests to add to the digest cache, known
> + * at this point by the parser calling this function.
> + *
> + * Return: Zero on success, a negative value otherwise.
> + */
> +int digest_cache_init_htable(struct digest_cache *digest_cache,
> + u64 num_digests)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + if (!digest_cache)
> + return 0;
> +
> + digest_cache->num_slots = num_digests / DIGEST_CACHE_HTABLE_DEPTH;
> + if (!digest_cache->num_slots)
> + digest_cache->num_slots = 1;
> +
> + digest_cache->slots = kmalloc_array(num_digests,
> + sizeof(*digest_cache->slots),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!digest_cache->slots)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < digest_cache->num_slots; i++)
> + INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&digest_cache->slots[i]);
> +
> + pr_debug("Initialized %d hash table slots for digest list %s\n",
> + digest_cache->num_slots, digest_cache->path_str);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * digest_cache_add - Add a new digest to the digest cache
> + * @digest_cache: Digest cache
> + * @digest: Digest to add
> + *
> + * This function, invoked by a digest list parser, adds a digest extracted
> + * from a digest list to the digest cache.
> + *
> + * Return: Zero on success, a negative value on error.

Nit: previous had a different phrasing "a negative value otherwise".

I would suggest "a POSIX error code otherwise" for both.

> + */
> +int digest_cache_add(struct digest_cache *digest_cache, u8 *digest)
> +{
> + struct digest_cache_entry *entry;
> + unsigned int key;
> + int digest_len;
> +
> + if (!digest_cache)
> + return 0;
> +
> + digest_len = hash_digest_size[digest_cache->algo];
> +
> + entry = kmalloc(sizeof(*entry) + digest_len, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!entry)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + memcpy(entry->digest, digest, digest_len);
> +
> + key = digest_cache_hash_key(digest, digest_cache->num_slots);
> + hlist_add_head(&entry->hnext, &digest_cache->slots[key]);
> + pr_debug("Add digest %s:%*phN from digest list %s\n",
> + hash_algo_name[digest_cache->algo], digest_len, digest,
> + digest_cache->path_str);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * digest_cache_lookup - Searches a digest in the digest cache
> + * @digest_cache: Digest cache
> + * @digest: Digest to search
> + * @algo: Algorithm of the digest to search
> + * @pathname: Path of the file whose digest is looked up
> + *
> + * This function, invoked by IMA or EVM, searches the calculated digest of
> + * a file or file metadata in the digest cache acquired with
> + * digest_cache_get().
> + *
> + * Return: Zero if the digest is found, a negative value if not.
> + */
> +int digest_cache_lookup(struct digest_cache *digest_cache, u8 *digest,
> + enum hash_algo algo, const char *pathname)
> +{
> + struct digest_cache_entry *entry;
> + unsigned int key;
> + int digest_len;
> + int search_depth = 0;
> +
> + if (!digest_cache)
> + return -ENOENT;
> +
> + if (digest_cache->algo == HASH_ALGO__LAST) {
> + pr_debug("Algorithm not set for digest list %s\n",
> + digest_cache->path_str);
> + return -ENOENT;
> + }
> +
> + digest_len = hash_digest_size[digest_cache->algo];
> +
> + if (algo != digest_cache->algo) {
> + pr_debug("Algo mismatch for file %s, digest %s:%*phN in digest list %s (%s)\n",
> + pathname, hash_algo_name[algo], digest_len, digest,
> + digest_cache->path_str,
> + hash_algo_name[digest_cache->algo]);
> + return -ENOENT;
> + }
> +
> + key = digest_cache_hash_key(digest, digest_cache->num_slots);
> +
> + hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(entry, &digest_cache->slots[key], hnext) {
> + if (!memcmp(entry->digest, digest, digest_len)) {
> + pr_debug("Cache hit at depth %d for file %s, digest %s:%*phN in digest list %s\n",
> + search_depth, pathname, hash_algo_name[algo],
> + digest_len, digest, digest_cache->path_str);
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + search_depth++;
> + }
> +
> + pr_debug("Cache miss for file %s, digest %s:%*phN in digest list %s\n",
> + pathname, hash_algo_name[algo], digest_len, digest,
> + digest_cache->path_str);
> + return -ENOENT;
> +}
> diff --git a/security/integrity/digest_cache.h b/security/integrity/digest_cache.h
> index ff88e8593c6..01cd70f9850 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/digest_cache.h
> +++ b/security/integrity/digest_cache.h
> @@ -66,6 +66,11 @@ static inline unsigned int digest_cache_hash_key(u8 *digest,
> void digest_cache_free(struct digest_cache *digest_cache);
> struct digest_cache *digest_cache_get(struct dentry *dentry,
> struct integrity_iint_cache *iint);
> +int digest_cache_init_htable(struct digest_cache *digest_cache,
> + u64 num_digests);
> +int digest_cache_add(struct digest_cache *digest_cache, u8 *digest);
> +int digest_cache_lookup(struct digest_cache *digest_cache, u8 *digest,
> + enum hash_algo algo, const char *pathname);
> #else
> static inline void digest_cache_free(struct digest_cache *digest_cache)
> {
> @@ -77,5 +82,24 @@ digest_cache_get(struct dentry *dentry, struct integrity_iint_cache *iint)
> return NULL;
> }
>
> +static inline int digest_cache_init_htable(struct digest_cache *digest_cache,
> + u64 num_digests)
> +{
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int digest_cache_add(struct digest_cache *digest_cache,
> + u8 *digest)
> +{
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int digest_cache_lookup(struct digest_cache *digest_cache,
> + u8 *digest, enum hash_algo algo,
> + const char *pathname)
> +{
> + return -ENOENT;
> +}
> +
> #endif /* CONFIG_INTEGRITY_DIGEST_CACHE */
> #endif /* _DIGEST_CACHE_H */
> --
> 2.34.1

Why all this complexity instead of using xarray?

https://docs.kernel.org/core-api/xarray.html

BR, Jarkko