Re: [GIT PULL] bcachefs

[Kent Overstreet]

On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 09:21:22AM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 09:21:41AM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 12:54:42PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > > > I don't want to do that to Christian either, I think highly of the work
> > > > he's been doing and I don't want to be adding to his frustration. So I
> > > > apologize for loosing my cool earlier; a lot of that was frustration
> > > > from other threads spilling over.
> > > > 
> > > > But: if he's going to be raising objections, I need to know what his
> > > > concerns are if we're going to get anywhere. Raising objections without
> > > > saying what the concerns are shuts down discussion; I don't think it's
> > > > unreasonable to ask people not to do that, and to try and stay focused
> > > > on the code.
> > > 
> > > The technical aspects were made clear off-list and I believe multiple
> > > times on-list by now. Any VFS and block related patches are to be
> > > reviewed and accepted before bcachefs gets merged.
> > 
> > Here's the one VFS patch in the series - could we at least get an ack
> > for this? It's a new helper, just breaks the existing d_tmpfile() up
> > into two functions - I hope we can at least agree that this patch
> > shouldn't be controversial?
> > 
> > -->--
> > Subject: [PATCH] fs: factor out d_mark_tmpfile()
> > 
> > New helper for bcachefs - bcachefs doesn't want the
> > inode_dec_link_count() call that d_tmpfile does, it handles i_nlink on
> > its own atomically with other btree updates
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> Yep, that looks good,
> Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks, much appreciated