Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] dt-bindings: input: qcom,pm8xxx-vib: add new SPMI vibrator module

From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Date: Mon Aug 14 2023 - 06:07:44 EST


On 31/07/2023 07:37, Fenglin Wu wrote:
> Add compatible string 'qcom,spmi-vib-gen2' to support vibrator module
> inside PMI632, PMI7250B, PM7325B, PM7550BA.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fenglin Wu <quic_fenglinw@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../bindings/input/qcom,pm8xxx-vib.yaml | 16 ++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/qcom,pm8xxx-vib.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/qcom,pm8xxx-vib.yaml
> index c8832cd0d7da..4a2319fc1e3f 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/qcom,pm8xxx-vib.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/qcom,pm8xxx-vib.yaml
> @@ -11,10 +11,18 @@ maintainers:
>
> properties:
> compatible:
> - enum:
> - - qcom,pm8058-vib
> - - qcom,pm8916-vib
> - - qcom,pm8921-vib
> + oneOf:
> + - enum:
> + - qcom,pm8058-vib
> + - qcom,pm8916-vib
> + - qcom,pm8921-vib
> + - items:
> + - enum:
> + - qcom,pmi632-vib
> + - qcom,pm7250b-vib
> + - qcom,pm7325b-vib
> + - qcom,pm7550b-vib
> + - const: qcom,spmi-vib-gen2

This does not seem to implement my comment:

"Entirely remove qcom,spmi-vib-gen2 and
qcom,spmi-vib-gen1.

Use device specific compatibles names only. As fallback and as first
compatible."

It's nice to respond that you disagree with it. Therefore, I am not
going to Ack it.

Best regards,
Krzysztof