Re: Does srso safe RET mitigation require microcode update?

From: Borislav Petkov
Date: Mon Aug 14 2023 - 05:11:22 EST

Next message: Björn Töpel: "Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/2] bpf, riscv: use BPF prog pack allocator in BPF JIT"
Previous message: tip-bot2 for Sean Christopherson: "[tip: x86/urgent] x86/retpoline: Don't clobber RFLAGS during srso_safe_ret()"
In reply to: Xi Ruoyao: "Does srso safe RET mitigation require microcode update?"
Next in thread: Rainer Fiebig: "Re: Does srso safe RET mitigation require microcode update?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 05:00:12PM +0800, Xi Ruoyao wrote:
> So we are puzzled now: is this system vulnerable or mitigated?

Read the whole options text here:

https://kernel.org/doc/html/latest/admin-guide/hw-vuln/srso.html

Does it explain it better?

--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette

Next message: Björn Töpel: "Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/2] bpf, riscv: use BPF prog pack allocator in BPF JIT"
Previous message: tip-bot2 for Sean Christopherson: "[tip: x86/urgent] x86/retpoline: Don't clobber RFLAGS during srso_safe_ret()"
In reply to: Xi Ruoyao: "Does srso safe RET mitigation require microcode update?"
Next in thread: Rainer Fiebig: "Re: Does srso safe RET mitigation require microcode update?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]