Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] perf pmus: Don't print duplicate PMU suffix in list by default

From: John Garry
Date: Fri Aug 11 2023 - 11:54:37 EST


On 10/08/2023 22:49, Ian Rogers wrote:
Duplicate PMUs are no longer printed by default but the suffix of the
first is printed. When duplicate PMUs are being skipped avoid printing
the suffix.

Before:
```
$ perf list
...
uncore_imc_free_running_0/data_read/ [Kernel PMU event]
uncore_imc_free_running_0/data_total/ [Kernel PMU event]
uncore_imc_free_running_0/data_write/ [Kernel PMU event]
```

After:
```
$ perf list
...
uncore_imc_free_running/data_read/ [Kernel PMU event]
uncore_imc_free_running/data_total/ [Kernel PMU event]
uncore_imc_free_running/data_write/ [Kernel PMU event]
...
$ perf list -v
uncore_imc_free_running_0/data_read/ [Kernel PMU event]
uncore_imc_free_running_0/data_total/ [Kernel PMU event]
uncore_imc_free_running_0/data_write/ [Kernel PMU event]
uncore_imc_free_running_1/data_read/ [Kernel PMU event]
uncore_imc_free_running_1/data_total/ [Kernel PMU event]
uncore_imc_free_running_1/data_write/ [Kernel PMU event]
...
```

Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
tools/perf/util/pmus.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/pmus.c b/tools/perf/util/pmus.c
index 5073843aca19..b0ecb2e5bdcc 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/pmus.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/pmus.c
@@ -440,10 +440,13 @@ static int sub_non_neg(int a, int b)
}
static char *format_alias(char *buf, int len, const struct perf_pmu *pmu,
- const struct perf_pmu_alias *alias)
+ const struct perf_pmu_alias *alias, bool skip_duplicate_pmus)
{
struct parse_events_term *term;
- int used = snprintf(buf, len, "%s/%s", pmu->name, alias->name);
+ int pmu_name_len = skip_duplicate_pmus
+ ? pmu_name_len_no_suffix(pmu->name, /*num=*/NULL)
+ : (int)strlen(pmu->name);
+ int used = snprintf(buf, len, "%.*s/%s", pmu_name_len, pmu->name, alias->name);
list_for_each_entry(term, &alias->terms, list) {
if (term->type_val == PARSE_EVENTS__TERM_TYPE_STR)
@@ -473,9 +476,10 @@ void perf_pmus__print_pmu_events(const struct print_callbacks *print_cb, void *p
int printed = 0;
int len, j;
struct sevent *aliases;
+ bool skip_duplicate_pmus = print_cb->skip_duplicate_pmus(print_state);

nit: that code could have been in the previous patch

struct perf_pmu *(*scan_fn)(struct perf_pmu *);
- if (print_cb->skip_duplicate_pmus(print_state))
+ if (skip_duplicate_pmus)
scan_fn = perf_pmus__scan_skip_duplicates;
else
scan_fn = perf_pmus__scan;
@@ -518,6 +522,7 @@ void perf_pmus__print_pmu_events(const struct print_callbacks *print_cb, void *p
*desc = NULL, *long_desc = NULL,
*encoding_desc = NULL, *topic = NULL,
*pmu_name = NULL;
+ int pmu_name_len;
bool deprecated = false;
size_t buf_used;
@@ -528,7 +533,8 @@ void perf_pmus__print_pmu_events(const struct print_callbacks *print_cb, void *p
if (!aliases[j].event) {
/* A selectable event. */
pmu_name = aliases[j].pmu->name;
- buf_used = snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "%s//", pmu_name) + 1;
+ pmu_name_len = pmu_name_len_no_suffix(pmu_name, /*num=*/NULL);
+ buf_used = snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "%.*s//", pmu_name_len, pmu_name) + 1;
name = buf;
} else {
if (aliases[j].event->desc) {
@@ -536,7 +542,7 @@ void perf_pmus__print_pmu_events(const struct print_callbacks *print_cb, void *p
buf_used = 0;
} else {
name = format_alias(buf, sizeof(buf), aliases[j].pmu,
- aliases[j].event);
+ aliases[j].event, skip_duplicate_pmus);
if (aliases[j].is_cpu) {
alias = name;
name = aliases[j].event->name;
@@ -554,8 +560,10 @@ void perf_pmus__print_pmu_events(const struct print_callbacks *print_cb, void *p
long_desc = aliases[j].event->long_desc;
topic = aliases[j].event->topic;
encoding_desc = buf + buf_used;
+ pmu_name_len = pmu_name_len_no_suffix(pmu_name, /*num=*/NULL);
buf_used += snprintf(buf + buf_used, sizeof(buf) - buf_used,
- "%s/%s/", pmu_name, aliases[j].event->str) + 1;
+ "%.*s/%s/", pmu_name_len, pmu_name,
+ aliases[j].event->str) + 1;
deprecated = aliases[j].event->deprecated;
}
print_cb->print_event(print_state,