Re: [PATCH V3 1/2] tick: Rename tick_do_update_jiffies64() and allow external usage

From: Huacai Chen
Date: Fri Aug 11 2023 - 00:33:38 EST


Hi, Alan,

On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 11:47 PM Alan Huang <mmpgouride@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> > 2023年8月10日 20:24,Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@xxxxxxxxxxx> 写道:
> >
> > Rename tick_do_update_jiffies64() to do_update_jiffies_64() and move it
> > to jiffies.c. This keeps the same naming style in jiffies.c and allow it
> > be used by external components. This patch is a preparation for the next
> > one which attempts to avoid necessary rcu stall warnings.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > V2: Fix build.
> > V3: Fix build again.
> >
> > include/linux/jiffies.h | 2 +
> > kernel/time/jiffies.c | 113 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 115 ++------------------------------------
> > kernel/time/timekeeping.h | 1 +
> > 4 files changed, 118 insertions(+), 113 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/jiffies.h b/include/linux/jiffies.h
> > index 5e13f801c902..48866314c68b 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/jiffies.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/jiffies.h
> > @@ -88,6 +88,8 @@ static inline u64 get_jiffies_64(void)
> > }
> > #endif
> >
> > +void do_update_jiffies_64(s64 now); /* typedef s64 ktime_t */
> > +
> > /*
> > * These inlines deal with timer wrapping correctly. You are
> > * strongly encouraged to use them
> > diff --git a/kernel/time/jiffies.c b/kernel/time/jiffies.c
> > index bc4db9e5ab70..507a1e7e619e 100644
> > --- a/kernel/time/jiffies.c
> > +++ b/kernel/time/jiffies.c
> > @@ -5,14 +5,14 @@
> > * Copyright (C) 2004, 2005 IBM, John Stultz (johnstul@xxxxxxxxxx)
> > */
> > #include <linux/clocksource.h>
> > +#include <linux/init.h>
> > #include <linux/jiffies.h>
> > #include <linux/module.h>
> > -#include <linux/init.h>
> > +#include <linux/sched/loadavg.h>
> >
> > #include "timekeeping.h"
> > #include "tick-internal.h"
> >
> > -
> > static u64 jiffies_read(struct clocksource *cs)
> > {
> > return (u64) jiffies;
> > @@ -61,6 +61,115 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(get_jiffies_64);
> >
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL(jiffies);
> >
> > +/*
> > + * The time, when the last jiffy update happened. Write access must hold
> > + * jiffies_lock and jiffies_seq. Because tick_nohz_next_event() needs to
> > + * get a consistent view of jiffies and last_jiffies_update.
> > + */
> > +ktime_t last_jiffies_update;
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Must be called with interrupts disabled !
> > + */
> > +void do_update_jiffies_64(ktime_t now)
> > +{
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON) || defined(CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS)
>
> Would it be better define the function like this?
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON) || defined(CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS)
>
> void do_update_jiffies_64(ktime_t now)
>
> #else
>
> void do_update_jiffies_64(ktime_t now)
>
> #endif
OK, thanks. But since I have sent three versions in one day (very
sorry for that), the next version will wait for some more comments.

Huacai
>
>
> > + unsigned long ticks = 1;
> > + ktime_t delta, nextp;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * 64bit can do a quick check without holding jiffies lock and
> > + * without looking at the sequence count. The smp_load_acquire()
> > + * pairs with the update done later in this function.
> > + *
> > + * 32bit cannot do that because the store of tick_next_period
> > + * consists of two 32bit stores and the first store could move it
> > + * to a random point in the future.
> > + */
> > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_64BIT)) {
> > + if (ktime_before(now, smp_load_acquire(&tick_next_period)))
> > + return;
> > + } else {
> > + unsigned int seq;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Avoid contention on jiffies_lock and protect the quick
> > + * check with the sequence count.
> > + */
> > + do {
> > + seq = read_seqcount_begin(&jiffies_seq);
> > + nextp = tick_next_period;
> > + } while (read_seqcount_retry(&jiffies_seq, seq));
> > +
> > + if (ktime_before(now, nextp))
> > + return;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* Quick check failed, i.e. update is required. */
> > + raw_spin_lock(&jiffies_lock);
> > + /*
> > + * Reevaluate with the lock held. Another CPU might have done the
> > + * update already.
> > + */
> > + if (ktime_before(now, tick_next_period)) {
> > + raw_spin_unlock(&jiffies_lock);
> > + return;
> > + }
> > +
> > + write_seqcount_begin(&jiffies_seq);
> > +
> > + delta = ktime_sub(now, tick_next_period);
> > + if (unlikely(delta >= TICK_NSEC)) {
> > + /* Slow path for long idle sleep times */
> > + s64 incr = TICK_NSEC;
> > +
> > + ticks += ktime_divns(delta, incr);
> > +
> > + last_jiffies_update = ktime_add_ns(last_jiffies_update,
> > + incr * ticks);
> > + } else {
> > + last_jiffies_update = ktime_add_ns(last_jiffies_update,
> > + TICK_NSEC);
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* Advance jiffies to complete the jiffies_seq protected job */
> > + jiffies_64 += ticks;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Keep the tick_next_period variable up to date.
> > + */
> > + nextp = ktime_add_ns(last_jiffies_update, TICK_NSEC);
> > +
> > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_64BIT)) {
> > + /*
> > + * Pairs with smp_load_acquire() in the lockless quick
> > + * check above and ensures that the update to jiffies_64 is
> > + * not reordered vs. the store to tick_next_period, neither
> > + * by the compiler nor by the CPU.
> > + */
> > + smp_store_release(&tick_next_period, nextp);
> > + } else {
> > + /*
> > + * A plain store is good enough on 32bit as the quick check
> > + * above is protected by the sequence count.
> > + */
> > + tick_next_period = nextp;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Release the sequence count. calc_global_load() below is not
> > + * protected by it, but jiffies_lock needs to be held to prevent
> > + * concurrent invocations.
> > + */
> > + write_seqcount_end(&jiffies_seq);
> > +
> > + calc_global_load();
> > +
> > + raw_spin_unlock(&jiffies_lock);
> > + update_wall_time();
> > +#endif
> > +}
> > +
> > static int __init init_jiffies_clocksource(void)
> > {
> > return __clocksource_register(&clocksource_jiffies);
> > diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> > index 4df14db4da49..c993c7dfe79d 100644
> > --- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> > +++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> > @@ -44,113 +44,6 @@ struct tick_sched *tick_get_tick_sched(int cpu)
> > }
> >
> > #if defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON) || defined(CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS)
> > -/*
> > - * The time, when the last jiffy update happened. Write access must hold
> > - * jiffies_lock and jiffies_seq. tick_nohz_next_event() needs to get a
> > - * consistent view of jiffies and last_jiffies_update.
> > - */
> > -static ktime_t last_jiffies_update;
> > -
> > -/*
> > - * Must be called with interrupts disabled !
> > - */
> > -static void tick_do_update_jiffies64(ktime_t now)
> > -{
> > - unsigned long ticks = 1;
> > - ktime_t delta, nextp;
> > -
> > - /*
> > - * 64bit can do a quick check without holding jiffies lock and
> > - * without looking at the sequence count. The smp_load_acquire()
> > - * pairs with the update done later in this function.
> > - *
> > - * 32bit cannot do that because the store of tick_next_period
> > - * consists of two 32bit stores and the first store could move it
> > - * to a random point in the future.
> > - */
> > - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_64BIT)) {
> > - if (ktime_before(now, smp_load_acquire(&tick_next_period)))
> > - return;
> > - } else {
> > - unsigned int seq;
> > -
> > - /*
> > - * Avoid contention on jiffies_lock and protect the quick
> > - * check with the sequence count.
> > - */
> > - do {
> > - seq = read_seqcount_begin(&jiffies_seq);
> > - nextp = tick_next_period;
> > - } while (read_seqcount_retry(&jiffies_seq, seq));
> > -
> > - if (ktime_before(now, nextp))
> > - return;
> > - }
> > -
> > - /* Quick check failed, i.e. update is required. */
> > - raw_spin_lock(&jiffies_lock);
> > - /*
> > - * Reevaluate with the lock held. Another CPU might have done the
> > - * update already.
> > - */
> > - if (ktime_before(now, tick_next_period)) {
> > - raw_spin_unlock(&jiffies_lock);
> > - return;
> > - }
> > -
> > - write_seqcount_begin(&jiffies_seq);
> > -
> > - delta = ktime_sub(now, tick_next_period);
> > - if (unlikely(delta >= TICK_NSEC)) {
> > - /* Slow path for long idle sleep times */
> > - s64 incr = TICK_NSEC;
> > -
> > - ticks += ktime_divns(delta, incr);
> > -
> > - last_jiffies_update = ktime_add_ns(last_jiffies_update,
> > - incr * ticks);
> > - } else {
> > - last_jiffies_update = ktime_add_ns(last_jiffies_update,
> > - TICK_NSEC);
> > - }
> > -
> > - /* Advance jiffies to complete the jiffies_seq protected job */
> > - jiffies_64 += ticks;
> > -
> > - /*
> > - * Keep the tick_next_period variable up to date.
> > - */
> > - nextp = ktime_add_ns(last_jiffies_update, TICK_NSEC);
> > -
> > - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_64BIT)) {
> > - /*
> > - * Pairs with smp_load_acquire() in the lockless quick
> > - * check above and ensures that the update to jiffies_64 is
> > - * not reordered vs. the store to tick_next_period, neither
> > - * by the compiler nor by the CPU.
> > - */
> > - smp_store_release(&tick_next_period, nextp);
> > - } else {
> > - /*
> > - * A plain store is good enough on 32bit as the quick check
> > - * above is protected by the sequence count.
> > - */
> > - tick_next_period = nextp;
> > - }
> > -
> > - /*
> > - * Release the sequence count. calc_global_load() below is not
> > - * protected by it, but jiffies_lock needs to be held to prevent
> > - * concurrent invocations.
> > - */
> > - write_seqcount_end(&jiffies_seq);
> > -
> > - calc_global_load();
> > -
> > - raw_spin_unlock(&jiffies_lock);
> > - update_wall_time();
> > -}
> > -
> > /*
> > * Initialize and return retrieve the jiffies update.
> > */
> > @@ -207,7 +100,7 @@ static void tick_sched_do_timer(struct tick_sched *ts, ktime_t now)
> >
> > /* Check, if the jiffies need an update */
> > if (tick_do_timer_cpu == cpu)
> > - tick_do_update_jiffies64(now);
> > + do_update_jiffies_64(now);
> >
> > /*
> > * If jiffies update stalled for too long (timekeeper in stop_machine()
> > @@ -218,7 +111,7 @@ static void tick_sched_do_timer(struct tick_sched *ts, ktime_t now)
> > ts->last_tick_jiffies = READ_ONCE(jiffies);
> > } else {
> > if (++ts->stalled_jiffies == MAX_STALLED_JIFFIES) {
> > - tick_do_update_jiffies64(now);
> > + do_update_jiffies_64(now);
> > ts->stalled_jiffies = 0;
> > ts->last_tick_jiffies = READ_ONCE(jiffies);
> > }
> > @@ -652,7 +545,7 @@ static void tick_nohz_update_jiffies(ktime_t now)
> > __this_cpu_write(tick_cpu_sched.idle_waketime, now);
> >
> > local_irq_save(flags);
> > - tick_do_update_jiffies64(now);
> > + do_update_jiffies_64(now);
> > local_irq_restore(flags);
> >
> > touch_softlockup_watchdog_sched();
> > @@ -975,7 +868,7 @@ static void tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick(struct tick_sched *ts, int cpu)
> > static void tick_nohz_restart_sched_tick(struct tick_sched *ts, ktime_t now)
> > {
> > /* Update jiffies first */
> > - tick_do_update_jiffies64(now);
> > + do_update_jiffies_64(now);
> >
> > /*
> > * Clear the timer idle flag, so we avoid IPIs on remote queueing and
> > diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.h b/kernel/time/timekeeping.h
> > index 543beba096c7..21670f6c7421 100644
> > --- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.h
> > +++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.h
> > @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ extern void update_wall_time(void);
> >
> > extern raw_spinlock_t jiffies_lock;
> > extern seqcount_raw_spinlock_t jiffies_seq;
> > +extern ktime_t last_jiffies_update;
> >
> > #define CS_NAME_LEN 32
> >
> > --
> > 2.39.3
> >
>