Re: [PATCH v2 04/12] iommu: Replace device fault handler with iommu_queue_iopf()

From: Jason Gunthorpe
Date: Thu Aug 10 2023 - 14:22:23 EST


On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 01:48:29PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> The individual iommu drivers report iommu faults by calling
> iommu_report_device_fault(), where a pre-registered device fault handler
> is called to route the fault to another fault handler installed on the
> corresponding iommu domain.
>
> The pre-registered device fault handler is static and won't be dynamic
> as the fault handler is eventually per iommu domain. Replace calling
> device fault handler with iommu_queue_iopf().
>
> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> index 4352a149a935..00309f66153b 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> @@ -1381,7 +1381,7 @@ int iommu_report_device_fault(struct device *dev, struct iommu_fault_event *evt)
> mutex_unlock(&fparam->lock);
> }
>
> - ret = fparam->handler(&evt->fault, fparam->data);
> + ret = iommu_queue_iopf(&evt->fault, dev);
> if (ret && evt_pending) {
> mutex_lock(&fparam->lock);
> list_del(&evt_pending->list);

I don't get it, why not remove fparam->handler/data entirely in this
patch? There is no user once you do this change?

Jason