Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] netfilter: ipset: refactor deprecated strncpy

From: Jan Engelhardt
Date: Wed Aug 09 2023 - 17:54:54 EST



On Wednesday 2023-08-09 23:40, Justin Stitt wrote:
>On Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 1:19 PM Florian Westphal <fw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Justin Stitt <justinstitt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > Use `strscpy_pad` instead of `strncpy`.
>>
>> I don't think that any of these need zero-padding.
>It's a more consistent change with the rest of the series and I don't
>believe it has much different behavior to `strncpy` (other than
>NUL-termination) as that will continue to pad to `n` as well.
>
>Do you think the `_pad` for 1/7, 6/7 and 7/7 should be changed back to
>`strscpy` in a v3? I really am shooting in the dark as it is quite
>hard to tell whether or not a buffer is expected to be NUL-padded or
>not.

I don't recall either NF userspace or kernelspace code doing memcmp
with name-like fields, so padding should not be strictly needed.