Re: [PATCH v2] SPARC: Fix parport_pc support for 32-bit platforms

From: Randy Dunlap
Date: Tue Aug 08 2023 - 15:57:50 EST


Hi,

Is there some way to have this build fix merged?
Thanks.


On 6/18/23 18:08, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
>
> On 6/18/23 18:01, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
>> For 32-bit SPARC platforms PC-style parallel ports are only available as
>> PCI options. Adjust <asm/parport.h> accordingly, fixing build errors:
>>
>> sparc-linux-gnu-ld: drivers/parport/parport_pc.o: in function `ecpp_remove':
>> parport_pc.c:(.text+0x8f0): undefined reference to `ebus_dma_irq_enable'
>> sparc-linux-gnu-ld: parport_pc.c:(.text+0x8f8): undefined reference to `ebus_dma_unregister'
>> sparc-linux-gnu-ld: drivers/parport/parport_pc.o: in function `parport_pc_fifo_write_block_dma':
>> parport_pc.c:(.text+0x1430): undefined reference to `ebus_dma_enable'
>> sparc-linux-gnu-ld: parport_pc.c:(.text+0x1444): undefined reference to `ebus_dma_prepare'
>> sparc-linux-gnu-ld: parport_pc.c:(.text+0x14e4): undefined reference to `ebus_dma_enable'
>> sparc-linux-gnu-ld: parport_pc.c:(.text+0x14f4): undefined reference to `ebus_dma_request'
>> sparc-linux-gnu-ld: parport_pc.c:(.text+0x1584): undefined reference to `ebus_dma_enable'
>> sparc-linux-gnu-ld: parport_pc.c:(.text+0x1594): undefined reference to `ebus_dma_residue'
>> sparc-linux-gnu-ld: parport_pc.c:(.text+0x1608): undefined reference to `ebus_dma_enable'
>> sparc-linux-gnu-ld: parport_pc.c:(.text+0x1618): undefined reference to `ebus_dma_residue'
>> sparc-linux-gnu-ld: drivers/parport/parport_pc.o: in function `ecpp_probe':
>> parport_pc.c:(.text+0x33a0): undefined reference to `ebus_dma_register'
>> sparc-linux-gnu-ld: parport_pc.c:(.text+0x33b8): undefined reference to `ebus_dma_irq_enable'
>> sparc-linux-gnu-ld: parport_pc.c:(.text+0x34b0): undefined reference to `ebus_dma_irq_enable'
>> sparc-linux-gnu-ld: parport_pc.c:(.text+0x34bc): undefined reference to `ebus_dma_unregister'
>>
>> Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230406160548.25721-1-rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/
>> Signed-off-by: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Fixes: 66bcd06099bb ("parport_pc: Also enable driver for PCI systems")
>> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # v5.18+
>
> Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> # build-tested
>
> Thanks for fixing this.
>
>> ---
>
>> Changes from v1:
>>
>> - Wrap `dma_spin_lock' into HAS_DMA to fix a "'dma_spin_lock' defined but
>> not used" warning. I think it's slightly cleaner this way compared to
>> wrapping the whole part into CONFIG_SPARC64, as this better reflects the
>> structure of the dependencies here. It also follows the structure of
>> parport_pc.c, which likewise has `parport_pc_fifo_write_block_dma' put
>> into CONFIG_PARPORT_PC_FIFO and then HAS_DMA conditionals.
>>
>> - Add Reported-by tag.
>> ---
>> arch/sparc/include/asm/parport.h | 7 +++++--
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> linux-sparc32-parport-pc.diff
>> Index: linux-macro/arch/sparc/include/asm/parport.h
>> ===================================================================
>> --- linux-macro.orig/arch/sparc/include/asm/parport.h
>> +++ linux-macro/arch/sparc/include/asm/parport.h
>> @@ -19,9 +19,11 @@
>> * While sparc64 doesn't have an ISA DMA API, we provide something that looks
>> * close enough to make parport_pc happy
>> */
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPARC64
>> #define HAS_DMA
>> +#endif
>>
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_PARPORT_PC_FIFO
>> +#if defined(CONFIG_PARPORT_PC_FIFO) && defined(HAS_DMA)
>> static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(dma_spin_lock);
>>
>> #define claim_dma_lock() \
>> @@ -249,7 +251,8 @@ static struct platform_driver ecpp_drive
>>
>> static int parport_pc_find_nonpci_ports(int autoirq, int autodma)
>> {
>> - return platform_driver_register(&ecpp_driver);
>> + return (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SPARC64) &&
>> + platform_driver_register(&ecpp_driver));
>> }
>>
>> #endif /* !(_ASM_SPARC64_PARPORT_H */
>

--
~Randy