Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/exec: use unique instead of local label

From: Boris Brezillon
Date: Mon Jul 31 2023 - 12:00:30 EST


On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 08:31:19 -0700
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 02:36:24PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> > GCC forbids to jump to labels in loop conditions and a new clang
> > check stumbled over this.
> >
> > So instead using a local label inside the loop condition use an
> > unique label outside of it.
> >
> > Fixes: commit 09593216bff1 ("drm: execution context for GEM buffers v7")
> > Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Statement-Exprs.html
> > Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1890
> > Link: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/20219106060208f0c2f5d096eb3aed7b712f5067
> > Reported-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > CC: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> > Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>
>
> Passes my build tests and I inspected the preprocessed output to make
> sure it should work. I ran the KUnit tests, which all pass (although [1]
> is needed to fix a tangential issue):
>
> Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks for fixing this!
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/20230728183400.306193-1-arthurgrillo@xxxxxxxxxx/
>
> > ---
> > include/drm/drm_exec.h | 14 +++++++-------
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/drm/drm_exec.h b/include/drm/drm_exec.h
> > index 73205afec162..e0462361adf9 100644
> > --- a/include/drm/drm_exec.h
> > +++ b/include/drm/drm_exec.h
> > @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
> > #ifndef __DRM_EXEC_H__
> > #define __DRM_EXEC_H__
> >
> > +#include <linux/compiler.h>
> > #include <linux/ww_mutex.h>
> >
> > #define DRM_EXEC_INTERRUPTIBLE_WAIT BIT(0)
> > @@ -74,13 +75,12 @@ struct drm_exec {
> > * Since labels can't be defined local to the loops body we use a jump pointer
> > * to make sure that the retry is only used from within the loops body.
> > */
> > -#define drm_exec_until_all_locked(exec) \
> > - for (void *__drm_exec_retry_ptr; ({ \
> > - __label__ __drm_exec_retry; \
> > -__drm_exec_retry: \
> > - __drm_exec_retry_ptr = &&__drm_exec_retry; \
> > - (void)__drm_exec_retry_ptr; \
> > - drm_exec_cleanup(exec); \
> > +#define drm_exec_until_all_locked(exec) \
> > +__PASTE(__drm_exec_, __LINE__): \
> > + for (void *__drm_exec_retry_ptr; ({ \
> > + __drm_exec_retry_ptr = &&__PASTE(__drm_exec_, __LINE__);\
> > + (void)__drm_exec_retry_ptr; \
> > + drm_exec_cleanup(exec); \
> > });)
> >
> > /**
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >
> >