Re: [PATCH 1/2] nvme-auth: unlock mutex in one place only

From: Christoph Hellwig
Date: Mon Jul 31 2023 - 09:53:28 EST

Next message: Mark Brown: "[PATCH v3 11/36] arm64/mm: Map pages for guarded control stack"
Previous message: Mark Brown: "[PATCH v3 10/36] mm: Define VM_SHADOW_STACK for arm64 when we support GCS"
In reply to: Sagi Grimberg: "Re: [PATCH 1/2] nvme-auth: unlock mutex in one place only"
Next in thread: Keith Busch: "Re: [1/2] nvme-auth: unlock mutex in one place only"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 02:00:37PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> Are imperative change descriptions still preferred?

It doesn't fucking matter. Please stop spamming nvme contributors.

Next message: Mark Brown: "[PATCH v3 11/36] arm64/mm: Map pages for guarded control stack"
Previous message: Mark Brown: "[PATCH v3 10/36] mm: Define VM_SHADOW_STACK for arm64 when we support GCS"
In reply to: Sagi Grimberg: "Re: [PATCH 1/2] nvme-auth: unlock mutex in one place only"
Next in thread: Keith Busch: "Re: [1/2] nvme-auth: unlock mutex in one place only"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]