Re: [PATCH v14 12/12] drm/gem: Add _unlocked postfix to drm_gem_pin/unpin()

[Dmitry Osipenko]

On 7/25/23 10:53, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Jul 2023 02:47:46 +0300
> Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> Make clear that drm_gem_pin/unpin() functions take reservation lock by
>> adding _unlocked postfix to the function names.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> I'm still a bit confused by the fact we sometimes use the
> xxx[_locked]() pattern (version without the _locked suffix takes the
> lock) and other times the xxx[_unlocked]() pattern (version with the
> _unlocked suffix takes the lock). It'd be good to chose one pattern and
> stick to it, at least for all core functions...

After a more close look, agree that the _locked variant is much more
common in DRM. Alright, I'll rename the drm-gem funcs.

-- 
Best regards,
Dmitry