Re: [PATCH V4] riscv: kexec: Fixup synchronization problem between init_mm and active_mm

From: Guo Ren
Date: Sun Jul 30 2023 - 23:25:26 EST

Next message: Hal Feng: "[PATCH v2 0/3] Add PWM-DAC audio support for StarFive JH7110 RISC-V SoC"
Previous message: LeoLiu-oc: "Re: [PATCH] hwrng: add Zhaoxin HW RNG driver"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 08:14:42PM -0400, Guo Ren wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 4:28 AM Alexandre Ghiti <alex@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 18/07/2023 14:30, Guo Ren wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 9:17 PM Alexandre Ghiti <alex@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On 14/07/2023 12:36, guoren@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > >>> From: Guo Ren <guoren@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >>>
> > >>> The machine_kexec() uses set_memory_x to modify the direct mapping
> > >>> attributes from RW to RWX. The current implementation of set_memory_x
> > >>> does not split hugepages in the linear mapping and then when a PGD
> > >>> mapping is used, the whole PGD is marked as executable. But changing
> > >>> the permissions at the PGD level must be propagated to all the page
> > >>> tables. When kexec jumps into control_buffer, the instruction page
> > >>> fault happens, and there is no minor_pagefault for it, then panic.
> > >>>
> > >>> The bug is found on an MMU_sv39 machine, and the direct mapping used a
> > >>> 1GB PUD, the pgd entries. Here is the bug output:
> > >>>
> > >>> kexec_core: Starting new kernel
> > >>> Will call new kernel at 00300000 from hart id 0
> > >>> FDT image at 747c7000
> > >>> Bye...
> > >>> Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffffffda23b0d000
> > >>> Oops [#1]
> > >>> Modules linked in:
> > >>> CPU: 0 PID: 53 Comm: uinit Not tainted 6.4.0-rc6 #15
> > >>> Hardware name: Sophgo Mango (DT)
> > >>> epc : 0xffffffda23b0d000
> > >>> ra : machine_kexec+0xa6/0xb0
> > >>> epc : ffffffda23b0d000 ra : ffffffff80008272 sp : ffffffc80c173d10
> > >>> gp : ffffffff8150e1e0 tp : ffffffd9073d2c40 t0 : 0000000000000000
> > >>> t1 : 0000000000000042 t2 : 6567616d69205444 s0 : ffffffc80c173d50
> > >>> s1 : ffffffd9076c4800 a0 : ffffffd9076c4800 a1 : 0000000000300000
> > >>> a2 : 00000000747c7000 a3 : 0000000000000000 a4 : ffffffd800000000
> > >>> a5 : 0000000000000000 a6 : ffffffd903619c40 a7 : ffffffffffffffff
> > >>> s2 : ffffffda23b0d000 s3 : 0000000000300000 s4 : 00000000747c7000
> > >>> s5 : 0000000000000000 s6 : 0000000000000000 s7 : 0000000000000000
> > >>> s8 : 0000000000000000 s9 : 0000000000000000 s10: 0000000000000000
> > >>> s11: 0000003f940001a0 t3 : ffffffff815351af t4 : ffffffff815351af
> > >>> t5 : ffffffff815351b0 t6 : ffffffc80c173b50
> > >>> status: 0000000200000100 badaddr: ffffffda23b0d000 cause: 000000000000000c
> > >>>
> > >>> Given the current flaw in the set_memory_x implementation, the simplest
> > >>> solution is to fix machine_kexec() to remap control code page outside
> > >>> the linear mapping. Because the control code buffer was moved from the
> > >>> direct mapping area to the vmalloc location, we need an additional
> > >>> va_va_offset to fix up va_pa_offset.
> > >>>
> > >>> Fixes: 3335068f8721 ("riscv: Use PUD/P4D/PGD pages for the linear mapping")
> > >>> Reviewed-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >>> Reported-by: Xing XiaoGuang <xingxg2008@xxxxxxx>
> > >>> Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >>> Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >>> ---
> > >>> Changelog:
> > >>> V4:
> > >>> - Fixup va_pa_offset with additional va_va_offset.
> > >>> - Add Reported-by tag.
> > >>>
> > >>> V3:
> > >>> - Resume set_memory_x to set the _PAGE_EXEC attribute
> > >>> - Optimize the commit log with Alexandre advice
> > >>>
> > >>> V2:
> > >>> - Use vm_map_ram instead of modifying set_memory_x
> > >>> - Correct Fixes tag
> > >>> ---
> > >>> arch/riscv/include/asm/kexec.h | 1 +
> > >>> arch/riscv/kernel/machine_kexec.c | 18 +++++++++++++++---
> > >>> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >>>
> > >>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kexec.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kexec.h
> > >>> index 2b56769cb530..17456e91476e 100644
> > >>> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kexec.h
> > >>> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kexec.h
> > >>> @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ crash_setup_regs(struct pt_regs *newregs,
> > >>> struct kimage_arch {
> > >>> void *fdt; /* For CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE */
> > >>> unsigned long fdt_addr;
> > >>> + void *control_code_buffer;
> > >>> };
> > >>>
> > >>> extern const unsigned char riscv_kexec_relocate[];
> > >>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/machine_kexec.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/machine_kexec.c
> > >>> index 2d139b724bc8..60c1ef3c2232 100644
> > >>> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/machine_kexec.c
> > >>> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/machine_kexec.c
> > >>> @@ -86,7 +86,14 @@ machine_kexec_prepare(struct kimage *image)
> > >>>
> > >>> /* Copy the assembler code for relocation to the control page */
> > >>> if (image->type != KEXEC_TYPE_CRASH) {
> > >>> - control_code_buffer = page_address(image->control_code_page);
> > >>> + control_code_buffer = vm_map_ram(&image->control_code_page,
> > >>> + KEXEC_CONTROL_PAGE_SIZE/PAGE_SIZE,
> > >>> + NUMA_NO_NODE);
> > >>> + if (control_code_buffer == NULL) {
> > >>> + pr_err("Failed to vm_map control page\n");
> > >>> + return -ENOMEM;
> > >>> + }
> > >>> +
> > >>> control_code_buffer_sz = page_size(image->control_code_page);
> > >>>
> > >>> if (unlikely(riscv_kexec_relocate_size > control_code_buffer_sz)) {
> > >>> @@ -99,6 +106,8 @@ machine_kexec_prepare(struct kimage *image)
> > >>>
> > >>> /* Mark the control page executable */
> > >>> set_memory_x((unsigned long) control_code_buffer, 1);
> > >>> +
> > >>> + internal->control_code_buffer = control_code_buffer;
> > >>> }
> > >>>
> > >>> return 0;
> > >>> @@ -211,7 +220,10 @@ machine_kexec(struct kimage *image)
> > >>> unsigned long this_cpu_id = __smp_processor_id();
> > >>> unsigned long this_hart_id = cpuid_to_hartid_map(this_cpu_id);
> > >>> unsigned long fdt_addr = internal->fdt_addr;
> > >>> - void *control_code_buffer = page_address(image->control_code_page);
> > >>> + void *control_code_buffer = internal->control_code_buffer;
> > >>> + unsigned long va_va_offset =
> > >>> + (unsigned long) page_address(image->control_code_page)
> > >>> + - (unsigned long) control_code_buffer;
> > >>> riscv_kexec_method kexec_method = NULL;
> > >>>
> > >>> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> > >>> @@ -234,6 +246,6 @@ machine_kexec(struct kimage *image)
> > >>> /* Jump to the relocation code */
> > >>> pr_notice("Bye...\n");
> > >>> kexec_method(first_ind_entry, jump_addr, fdt_addr,
> > >>> - this_hart_id, kernel_map.va_pa_offset);
> > >>> + this_hart_id, kernel_map.va_pa_offset - va_va_offset);
> > >>> unreachable();
> > >>> }
> > >>
> > >> I started working on the set_memory fix and the first thing to do is to
> > >> prevent the use of PGD mapping, it's too cumbersome to propagate changes
> > >> at this level: IIRC x86 keeps a list of page tables to go through
> > >> whenever that happens, that's why Bjorn pre-allocated all the PGD
> > >> entries to cover the vmalloc region.
> > >>
> > >> So, to me, the simple fix for this issue is to prevent the use of PGD
> > >> mapping. What do you think? Does the following patch work?
> > > The PGD mapping is necessary (especially for Sv32, Sv39), and it has
> > > been solved under your first advice. I think limit set_memory_x usage
> > > is the smart choice for now.
> >
> >
> > If we use PGD mappings, we won't be able to change the protections or
> > remove pages from the linear mapping as we don't have a means to
> > synchronize all the page tables. Removing pages from the linear mapping
> > is used for example for memfd_secret and certainly other things so that
> > means using PGD mappings will break a few things.
> >
> > The benefits of PGD mappings for the linear mapping was not proven, and
> We need PGD mappings for Sv32. liner mapping with 4KB would cause a
> significant performance gap in the small core (memset stride with 4KB,
> PTW with every store).
>
> > even if I agree we should do our best to keep the largest mapping
> > possible just in case, implementing a page table synchronization seems
> > very cumbersome (x86 does that though).
> >
> > I'm not opposed to your solution, but:
Hi Alexandre & Palmer,

This patch is about fixing the problem of kexec, not solving the larger
scale of set_memory_x/pgd_mapping problems. And only limiting the
changes in the control buffer page is also necessary. Kexec shouldn't
modify direct mapping attributes.

Here is the flow of sg2042:
zsbl -> opensbi -> linux-boot (kexec boot next stage) -> linux
(ubuntu/Fedora)

Could we merge this patch first?

Best Regards
Guo Ren

> >
> > - either we remove the PGD mappings, and your problem is fixed,
> This patch limits control_buffer_code into a 4KB page mapping entry. I
> don't think they are the same solution, even you remove the PGD
> mappings.
>
> >
> > - or we keep PGD mappings, implement a page table synchronization, and
> > your problem is fixed.
> We need your synchronization, but not for this case.
>
> >
> > And since we need to fix this larger problem, I don't see the point of
> > this workaround.
> This patch is for kexec. See title riscv: kexec: tag.
>
> And I don't think your larger problem needs to be fixed. I agree with
> your first point that simply limit the usage of set_memory_x.
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Alex
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >>
> > >> diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/init.c b/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
> > >> index 70fb31960b63..6dd12443bfa4 100644
> > >> --- a/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
> > >> +++ b/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
> > >> @@ -662,13 +662,12 @@ void __init create_pgd_mapping(pgd_t *pgdp,
> > >> static uintptr_t __init best_map_size(phys_addr_t pa, uintptr_t va,
> > >> phys_addr_t size)
> > >> {
> > >> - if (!(pa & (PGDIR_SIZE - 1)) && !(va & (PGDIR_SIZE - 1)) && size
> > >> >= PGDIR_SIZE)
> > >> - return PGDIR_SIZE;
> > >> -
> > >> - if (!(pa & (P4D_SIZE - 1)) && !(va & (P4D_SIZE - 1)) && size >=
> > >> P4D_SIZE)
> > >> + if (pgtable_l5_enabled &&
> > >> + !(pa & (P4D_SIZE - 1)) && !(va & (P4D_SIZE - 1)) && size >=
> > >> P4D_SIZE)
> > >> return P4D_SIZE;
> > >>
> > >> - if (!(pa & (PUD_SIZE - 1)) && !(va & (PUD_SIZE - 1)) && size >=
> > >> PUD_SIZE)
> > >> + if (pgtable_l4_enabled &&
> > >> + !(pa & (PUD_SIZE - 1)) && !(va & (PUD_SIZE - 1)) && size >=
> > >> PUD_SIZE)
> > >> return PUD_SIZE;
> > >>
> > >> if (!(pa & (PMD_SIZE - 1)) && !(va & (PMD_SIZE - 1)) && size >=
> > >> PMD_SIZE)
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >>
> > >> Alex
> > >>
> > >
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards
> Guo Ren
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

Next message: Hal Feng: "[PATCH v2 0/3] Add PWM-DAC audio support for StarFive JH7110 RISC-V SoC"
Previous message: LeoLiu-oc: "Re: [PATCH] hwrng: add Zhaoxin HW RNG driver"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]