Re: [PATCH v2] net: stmmac: correct MAC propagation delay

[Richard Cochran]

On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 08:40:51AM +0200, Johannes Zink wrote:
> Hi Richard,
> 
> On 7/26/23 17:34, Richard Cochran wrote:
> > That is great, until they change the data sheet.  Really, this happens.
> 
> I think I don't get your point here.
> 
> That's true for literally any register of any peripheral in a datasheet.
> I think we can just stop doing driver development if we wait for a final
> revision that is not changed any more. Datasheets change, and if they do we
> update the driver.

This is different than normal registers, because the values are a
guess as to what the latency in the hardware design is.

Here is how it works in practice:  Vendor first asks a summer intern to
measure the latency.  Intern does some kind of random measurement, and
that goes into silicon.  One year later, customers discover that the
values are bogus.  Vendor doesn't spin a new silicon revision just for
that.  If vendor is honest, a footnote appears in the errata that the
corrections are wrong.

Thanks,
Richard