Re: [PATCH -next] drm: omapdrm: dss: Remove redundant DSSERR()

[Uwe Kleine-König]

Hello,

On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 11:39:23AM +0000, Ruan Jinjie wrote:
> There is no need to call the DSSERR() function directly to print
> a custom message when handling an error from platform_get_irq() function
> as it is going to display an appropriate error message
> in case of a failure.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ruan Jinjie <ruanjinjie@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/dispc.c | 1 -
>  drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/dsi.c   | 4 +---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/hdmi4.c | 1 -
>  drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/hdmi5.c | 1 -
>  4 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/dispc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/dispc.c
> index c26aab4939fa..9209103f5dc5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/dispc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/dispc.c
> @@ -4779,7 +4779,6 @@ static int dispc_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master, void *data)
>  
>  	dispc->irq = platform_get_irq(dispc->pdev, 0);
>  	if (dispc->irq < 0) {
> -		DSSERR("platform_get_irq failed\n");
>  		r = -ENODEV;
>  		goto err_free;
>  	}

Orthogonal to your patch I wonder about r = -ENODEV. Wouldn't r =
dispc->irq be the sensible option? Ditto for the other hunks.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature