Re: [syzbot] [bpf?] WARNING: ODEBUG bug in tcx_uninstall

[Leon Romanovsky]

On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 04:33:40PM -0700, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
> On 7/26/23 11:16 AM, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
> > On 7/26/23 10:01 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 08:23:12AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 26 Jul 2023 10:12:54 +0300 Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > > > > Thanks, I'll take a look this evening.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Did anybody post a fix for that?
> > > > > 
> > > > > We are experiencing the following kernel panic in netdev commit
> > > > > b57e0d48b300 (net-next/main) Merge branch '100GbE' of
> > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tnguy/next-queue
> > > > 
> > > > Not that I know, looks like this is with Daniel's previous fix already
> > > > present, and syzbot is hitting it, too :(
> > > 
> > > My naive workaround which restored our regression runs is:
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/kernel/bpf/tcx.c b/kernel/bpf/tcx.c
> > > index 69a272712b29..10c9ab830702 100644
> > > --- a/kernel/bpf/tcx.c
> > > +++ b/kernel/bpf/tcx.c
> > > @@ -111,6 +111,7 @@ void tcx_uninstall(struct net_device *dev, bool ingress)
> > >                          bpf_prog_put(tuple.prog);
> > >                  tcx_skeys_dec(ingress);
> > >          }
> > > -       WARN_ON_ONCE(tcx_entry(entry)->miniq_active);
> > > +       tcx_miniq_set_active(entry, false);
> > 
> > Thanks for the report. I will look into it.
> 
> I don't see how that may be triggered for now after Daniel's recent fix in
> commit dc644b540a2d ("tcx: Fix splat in ingress_destroy upon
> tcx_entry_free"). 

Both our regression and syzbot have this fix in the trees.


> Do you have a small reproducible case? Thanks.

Unfortunately no.

Thanks

> 
> > 
> > >          tcx_entry_free(entry);
> > >   }
> > > 
> > 
> > 
>