Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] tracing: Add free_trace_iter_content() helper function

From: Google
Date: Wed Jul 26 2023 - 09:42:38 EST


On Sat, 15 Jul 2023 10:12:15 -0400
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> As the trace iterator is created and used by various interfaces, the clean
> up of it needs to be consistent. Create a free_trace_iter_content() helper
> function that frees the content of the iterator and use that to clean it
> up in all places that it is used.
>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>

BTW, this adds iter->fmt != static_fmt_buf check. Is it a kind of fix?

Thank you,

> ---
> kernel/trace/trace.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
> index 1c370ffbe062..8775930aa545 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
> @@ -4815,6 +4815,25 @@ static const struct seq_operations tracer_seq_ops = {
> .show = s_show,
> };
>
> +/*
> + * Note, as iter itself can be allocated and freed in different
> + * ways, this function is only used to free its content, and not
> + * the iterator itself. The only requirement to all the allocations
> + * is that it must zero all fields (kzalloc), as freeing works with
> + * ethier allocated content or NULL.
> + */
> +static void free_trace_iter_content(struct trace_iterator *iter)
> +{
> + /* The fmt is either NULL, allocated or points to static_fmt_buf */
> + if (iter->fmt != static_fmt_buf)
> + kfree(iter->fmt);
> +
> + kfree(iter->temp);
> + kfree(iter->buffer_iter);
> + mutex_destroy(&iter->mutex);
> + free_cpumask_var(iter->started);
> +}
> +
> static struct trace_iterator *
> __tracing_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file, bool snapshot)
> {
> @@ -4922,8 +4941,7 @@ __tracing_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file, bool snapshot)
>
> fail:
> mutex_unlock(&trace_types_lock);
> - kfree(iter->temp);
> - kfree(iter->buffer_iter);
> + free_trace_iter_content(iter);
> release:
> seq_release_private(inode, file);
> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> @@ -5002,11 +5020,7 @@ static int tracing_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
>
> mutex_unlock(&trace_types_lock);
>
> - mutex_destroy(&iter->mutex);
> - free_cpumask_var(iter->started);
> - kfree(iter->fmt);
> - kfree(iter->temp);
> - kfree(iter->buffer_iter);
> + free_trace_iter_content(iter);
> seq_release_private(inode, file);
>
> return 0;
> @@ -6763,10 +6777,7 @@ static int tracing_release_pipe(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
>
> mutex_unlock(&trace_types_lock);
>
> - free_cpumask_var(iter->started);
> - kfree(iter->fmt);
> - kfree(iter->temp);
> - mutex_destroy(&iter->mutex);
> + free_trace_iter_content(iter);
> kfree(iter);
>
> trace_array_put(tr);
> --
> 2.40.1


--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>