Re: [PATCH v2 08/14] selftests/nolibc: string the core targets

[Zhangjin Wu]

> On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 09:26:01PM +0800, Zhangjin Wu wrote:
> > To avoid run targets one by one manually and boringly, let's string them
> > with IMAGE and .config, the MAKE command will trigger the dependencies
> > for us.
> > 
> > Note, to allow do menuconfig before extconfig manually, only trigger
> > defconfig while the .config is not there, it means only trigger
> > defconfig for the first run or after a mrproper.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Zhangjin Wu <falcon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile | 18 +++++++++++++-----
> >  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile
> > index 83cb4b017bef..541f3565e584 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile
> (...)
> > -extconfig:
> > +extconfig: $(KERNEL_CONFIG)
> >  	$(Q)$(srctree)/scripts/kconfig/merge_config.sh -O "$(objtree)" -m "$(KERNEL_CONFIG)" $(foreach c,$(EXTCONFIG),$(wildcard $(CURDIR)/configs/$c))
> >  	$(Q)$(MAKE_KERNEL) KCONFIG_ALLCONFIG="$(KERNEL_CONFIG)" allnoconfig
> >  
> > -kernel: initramfs
> > +kernel: extconfig
> > +	$(Q)$(MAKE) --no-print-directory initramfs
> 
> There seems to be something wrong here. From what I'm seeing, now if I
> run "make kernel" it will run extconfig and possibly change the config
> I just edited.
>

Yeah, extconfig will run for every 'make kernel', it is ok for us to
let kernel depends on $(KERNEL_CONFIG), but this requires users to run
extconfig explictly, the solution may be:

- move extconfig operations to defconfig target and future tinyconfig target (it looks cleaner ...)

    - but it is not convenient to trigger additional changes introduced by
      extconfig, not necessary, but really helpful, something like 'menuconfig'

- let users run extconfig manually after a defconfig or tinyconfig (it is a little complex)

    - this make users hard to learn what to do, should give up this method

- run extconfig for every 'make kernel' as it currently do

    - this may change something after a menuconfig, but it only trigger minimal
      required options, the 'hurt' should be minimal, but of course, it may confuse sometimes ;-(

As a summary, let's remove 'extconfig' and move its operations to the defconfig
and the future tinyconfig targets? 'extconfig' should be a 'default' config
action, let users apply additional ones manually from the top-level 'make
menuconfig', what's your idea?

> Or am I missing something ? I must confess all of this is becoming more
> and more obscure :-(

Yeah ... let's find a better solution ;-)

Best regards,
Zhangjin

> 
> Willy