Re: [PATCH] memory: tegra: Add dummy implementation on Tegra194

[Jon Hunter]

Hi Krzysztof,

On 10/07/2023 14:29, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 10/07/2023 15:06, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 12:10:43PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > On 29/06/2023 18:01, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > > From: Thierry Reding <treding@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >
> > > > With the introduction of commit 9365bf006f53 ("PCI: tegra194: Add
> > > > interconnect support in Tegra234"), the PCI driver on Tegra194 and later
> > > > requires an interconnect provider. However, a provider is currently only
> > > > exposed on Tegra234 and this causes PCI on Tegra194 to defer probe
> > > > indefinitely.
> > > >
> > > > Fix this by adding a dummy implementation on Tegra194. This allows nodes
> > > > to be provided to interconnect consumers, but doesn't do any bandwidth
> > > > accounting or frequency scaling.
> > > >
> > > > Fixes: 9365bf006f53 ("PCI: tegra194: Add interconnect support in Tegra234")
> > > > Reported-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Applied with checkpatch warning. Please be sure you run checkpatch
> > > before sending the patches.
> >
> > Are you referring to the Reported-by/Closes complaint?
>
> Yes.
>
> > I didn't include
> > a URL here because this came from an internal test report and there's no
> > corresponding public reference.
>
> Ah, ok, apologies for pickiness then. :)
>
> > I suppose I could've left out the Reported-by altogether.
>
> I think it is fine. Checkpatch warning is just advisory.


We need this in v6.5 as a fix, because without this change PCIe support 
is broken on Tegra194 devices. Would you be able to send as a fix for v6.5?

Thanks!
Jon

--
nvpublic