Re: [PATCH V5 2/3] pinctrl: qcom: Use qcom_scm_io_update_field()

From: Kathiravan T
Date: Sun Jul 23 2023 - 09:49:06 EST



On 7/22/2023 8:39 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 12:34:07PM +0530, Kathiravan T wrote:
From: Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Use qcom_scm_io_update_field() function introduced in the commit
1f899e6997bb ("firmware: qcom_scm: provide a read-modify-write function").

Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Kathiravan T <quic_kathirav@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Changes in V5:
- Dropped the ununecessary paranthesis
- Updated the commit message to indicate the commit ID in which
qcom_scm_io_update_field is introduced instead of simply
mentioning the "last commit"

drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c | 12 +++++-------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c
index 2585ef2b2793..5ecde5bea38b 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c
@@ -1040,6 +1040,7 @@ static int msm_gpio_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
const struct msm_pingroup *g;
unsigned long flags;
bool was_enabled;
+ u32 mask;
u32 val;
if (msm_gpio_needs_dual_edge_parent_workaround(d, type)) {
@@ -1074,23 +1075,20 @@ static int msm_gpio_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
* With intr_target_use_scm interrupts are routed to
* application cpu using scm calls.
*/
+ mask = GENMASK(2, 0) << g->intr_target_bit;
if (pctrl->intr_target_use_scm) {
u32 addr = pctrl->phys_base[0] + g->intr_target_reg;
int ret;
- qcom_scm_io_readl(addr, &val);
-
- val &= ~(7 << g->intr_target_bit);
- val |= g->intr_target_kpss_val << g->intr_target_bit;
-
- ret = qcom_scm_io_writel(addr, val);
+ val = g->intr_target_kpss_val << g->intr_target_bit;
+ ret = qcom_scm_io_update_field(addr, mask, val);
Be aware when you resubmit that this code has changed. So please base
your changes on linux-next.


I applied and tested this change on top of linux-next before sending it. I hope you are referring to the Ninad's patch[1] which is not available on linux-next yet. I shall wait for couple of days before sending the another version or let me resend based on Ninad's patch. Please let me know if you are referring something else.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20230718064246.12429-1-quic_ninanaik@xxxxxxxxxxx/


Regards,
Bjorn