Re: [PATCH 10/10] ext4: correct some stale comment of criteria

From: IBM
Date: Fri Jul 21 2023 - 11:49:46 EST


Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> We named criteria with CR_XXX, correct stale comment to criteria with
> raw number.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)


Looks good to me. Feel free to add:

Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@xxxxxxxxx>

-ritesh

>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> index b04eceeab967..e30494f3d289 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> @@ -2778,8 +2778,8 @@ ext4_mb_regular_allocator(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac)
>
> /*
> * ac->ac_2order is set only if the fe_len is a power of 2
> - * if ac->ac_2order is set we also set criteria to 0 so that we
> - * try exact allocation using buddy.
> + * if ac->ac_2order is set we also set criteria to CR_POWER2_ALIGNED
> + * so that we try exact allocation using buddy.
> */
> i = fls(ac->ac_g_ex.fe_len);
> ac->ac_2order = 0;
> @@ -2836,8 +2836,8 @@ ext4_mb_regular_allocator(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac)
> /*
> * Batch reads of the block allocation bitmaps
> * to get multiple READs in flight; limit
> - * prefetching at cr=0/1, otherwise mballoc can
> - * spend a lot of time loading imperfect groups
> + * prefetching at cr below CR_FAST, otherwise mballoc
> + * can spend a lot of time loading imperfect groups
> */
> if ((prefetch_grp == group) &&
> (cr >= CR_FAST ||
> --
> 2.30.0