Re: [PATCH v2 09/11] cpufreq: scmi: Add support to parse domain-id using #power-domain-cells

[Ulf Hansson]

On Wed, 19 Jul 2023 at 17:24, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 04:17:36PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > The performance domain-id can be described in DT using the power-domains
> > property or the clock property. The latter is already supported, so let's
> > add support for the power-domains too.
> >
>
> How is this supposed to work for the CPUs ? The CPU power domains are
> generally PSCI on most of the platforms and the one using OSI explicitly
> need to specify the details while ones using PC will not need to. Also they
> can never be performance domains too. So I am not sure if I am following this
> correctly.

Your concerns are certainly correct, I completely forgot about this.
We need to specify what power-domain index belongs to what, by using
power-domain-names in DT. So a CPU node, that has both psci for power
and scmi for performance would then typically look like this:

power-domains = <&CPU_PD0>, <&scmi_dvfs 4>;
power-domain-names = "psci", "scmi";

I will take care of this in the next version - and thanks a lot for
pointing this out!

Kind regards
Uffe