Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] Add ethernet nodes for StarFive JH7110 SoC

[Guo Samin]

on 2023/7/21 17:16:41, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 03:27:33PM +0800, Guo Samin wrote:
> 
>> Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] Add ethernet nodes for StarFive JH7110 SoC
>> From: Conor Dooley <conor@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
>> to: Guo Samin <samin.guo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>, Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@xxxxxxxxxx>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Albert Ou <aou@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Hal Feng <hal.feng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-riscv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> data: 2023/7/21
> 
> btw, please try and remove this stuff from your mails.
>

Sure
 
>>> On 21 July 2023 03:09:19 IST, Guo Samin <samin.guo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>>>> There is a question about the configuration of phy that I would like to consult you.
>>>>
>>>> Latest on motorcomm PHY V5[1]: Follow Rob Herring's advice
>>>> motorcomm,rx-xxx-driver-strength Changed to motorcomm,rx-xxx-drv-microamp .
>>>> V5 has already received a reviewed-by from Andrew Lunn, and it should not change again.
>>>>
>>>> Should I submit another pacthes based on riscv-dt-for-next? 
>>>
>>> Huh, dtbs_check passed for these patches,
>>> I didn't realise changes to the motorcomm stuff
>>> were a dep. for this. I'll take a look later.
> 
>> After discussing with HAL, I have prepared the code and considered adding the following patch to 
>> Motorcomm's patchsetes v6. (To fix some spelling errors in v5[1])
>> which will then send patches based on linux-next. What do you think? @Andrew @Conor
> 
> I think you are better off just sending the dts patch to me, adding a
> dts patch that will not apply to net-next to your motorcomm driver series
> will only really cause problems for the netdev patchwork automation.
>

Okay, I'll send you DTS separately.
 
>> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/cover/20230720111509.21843-1-samin.guo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> I meant to ack this yesterday, but it wasn't in my dt-binding review
> queue. I'll go do that now.


Best regards,
Samin