Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Fix scan-build warnings

[Eric Van Hensbergen]

On Wed, 03 May 2023 16:49:24 +0900, Dominique Martinet wrote:
> I ran scan-build very crudly on our source files, and there was at least
> one real bug so we might as well run it once in a while, in which case
> we probably ought to also fix the less important things hence this
> series.
> In here the first patch is a real fix and the rest is low priority, the
> last one is arguably not an improvement and can be discussed (happy to
> just move the 0-initializations around to variable declaration which
> would also silence scan-build afaict)
> 
> [...]

Applied, thanks!

[1/5] 9p: fix ignored return value in v9fs_dir_release
      commit: eee4a119e96c2f58cfd1b6d4de42095abc5f8877
[2/5] 9p: virtio: fix unlikely null pointer deref in handle_rerror
      commit: 13ade4ac5c28e8a014fa85278f5a4270b215f906
[3/5] 9p: virtio: make sure 'offs' is initialized in zc_request
      commit: 4a73edab69d3a6623f03817fe950a2d9585f80e4
[4/5] 9p: virtio: skip incrementing unused variable
      commit: f41b402d2572e93bee85669ed05eb5e1f3725704
[5/5] 9p: remove dead stores (variable set again without being read)
      commit: cf7c33d332ab67603f159123b691c61270b14c33

Best regards,
-- 
Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@xxxxxxxxxx>