Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] memory recharging for offline memcgs

[Tejun Heo]

On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 11:35:15AM -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> It could also be argued that if you don't want to lose control over a
> set of resources, then maybe don't delete their control domain while
> they are still alive and in use. For example, when restarting a
> workload, and the new instance is expected to have largely the same
> workingset, consider reusing the cgroup instead of making a new one.

Or just create a nesting layer so that there's a cgroup which represents the
persistent resources and a nested cgroup instance inside representing the
current instance.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun